Community Food Systems: Strengthening the Research-to-Practice Continuum

Abstract

Growing public interest in links between food, health, and the environment has sparked exponential growth in local and regional food system projects. Along with local experimentation has come an accompanying surge in related academic research. Are we learning what we need to know to expand the impact of the work? This paper introduces a new community food systems bibliography as a tool to help build usable knowledge. Drawing on a set of literature reviews prepared by students in a University of California Davis graduate seminar, we illustrate how the bibliography can facilitate literature scans to begin to identify persistent and strategic challenges facing community food system practitioners. Our analysis of the student reviews finds three interrelated challenges: (1) an economic challenge rooted in the difficulty of finding price points that work for farmers while ensuring that low-income consumers have access to healthy food and food system workers have decent wages and benefits; (2) a social challenge to confront racial and class bias while forging practical solutions; and (3) a political challenge of reconciling "insider" and a *

Gearing up to support urban farming in California: Preliminary results of a needs assessment

“…In particular, comparative case studies that involve both researchers and community practitioners in design, data gathering and analysis, can begin to address some of the social justice challenges faced in UA settings 67 . Beyond providing a source of accessible, science-based information for urban farmers and policy makers, UC ANR and similar institutions can play an important role in contributing to the growing body of knowledge on UA and its impacts on communities.…”

Reflexive Resilience and Community Supported Agriculture: The Case that Emerged from a Place

“…In both cases, the answer is a lot, but with limits. Campbell, Carlisle-Cummins and Feenstra (2013) note it is important to attempt to bridge the gap between research and practice in community food systems. The learning outcomes from this study emerged from the lived experience of being a CSA member in a particular place for a year, so the study was practice-led.…”

“…So this research, following Fuller (1999), was not so much about 'going native' as about being aware of the issues and benefits of being as 'native' as any other newcomer in a CSA established by a community of newcomers. As Campbell et al(2013)stated, "practitioners need to be active partners in advancing and generating new knowledge. This might include putting greater priority on fostering partnerships between practitioners and researchers to design and implement research projects on identified challenges"(p. 133).…”

Foundation of CS-DC e-Laboratory: Open Systems Exploration for Ecosystems Leveraging

“…The biggest interest is to study alternative farming techniques [77] that have been studied very little by agronomists until now, including synecoculture, permaculture [65,64], and bio-intensive micro-farming [76]. The platform also allows the community explore new technological tools and sensors to monitor and optimise these cropping techniques, using a collaborative approach [70,75]. ‡ See https://p2pfoodlab.net/CitizenSeeds/experiments/4.html (Peter Hanappe)…”