Community engagement and data quality: best practices and lessons learned from a citizen science project on birdsong

Abstract

Citizen Science (CS) is a research approach that has become popular in recent years and offers innovative potential for dialect research in ornithology. As the scepticism about CS data is still widespread, we analysed the development of a 3-year CS project based on the song of the Common Nightingale (Luscinia megarhynchos) to share best practices and lessons learned. We focused on the data scope, individual engagement, spatial distribution and species misidentifications from recordings generated before (2018, 2019) and during the COVID-19 outbreak (2020) with a smartphone using the ‘Naturblick’ app. The number of nightingale song recordings and individual engagement increased steadily and peaked in the season during the pandemic. 13,991 nightingale song recordings were generated by anonymous (64%) and non-anonymous participants (36%). As the project developed, the spatial distribution of recordings expanded (from Berlin based to nationwide). The rates of species misidentifications were low, decreased in the course of the project (10–1%) and were mainly affected by vocal similarities with other bird species. This study further showed that community engagement and data quality were not directly affected by dissemination activities, but that the former was influenced by external factors and the latter benefited from the app. We conclude that CS projects using smartphone apps with an integrated pattern recognition algorithm are well suited to support bioacoustic research in ornithology. Based on our findings, we recommend setting up CS projects over the long term to build an engaged community which generates high data quality for robust scientific conclusions.

The Eyewitness Community Survey: An Engaging Citizen Science Tool to Capture Reliable Data while Improving Community Participants’ Environmental Health Knowledge and Attitudes

“…The demonstration of the ECS's reliability is important, as there is a negative stigma around citizen science data [25]. Our results are consistent with prior work that has shown that such data can be of a high quality [26][27][28]. The development and design of the tool likely contributed to its reliability.…”

How Citizen Science Projects Contribute to Urban Biodiversity Monitoring and Conservation Frameworks—A German Case Study

“…We believe that CS data on biodiversity, however, should not be seen as a substitute for academic biodiversity research, but rather as a valuable addition. Regarding the current quality debate, one must be aware of and accept the existing limitations of CS (Jäckel et al 2023). Recognition of CS data could and should yet be increased by establishing and communicating clear standards for data (quality), and encouraging collaboration between CS stakeholders and authorities.…”

Quiz-style online training tool helps to learn birdsong identification and support citizen science

“…Training to improve identification skills is expected to increase the data quantity and quality ( Greenwood, 2007 ; Bonney et al, 2009b ; McLaren & Cadman, 1999 ) and to improve the participants’ interest in the natural environment ( Hsu, Chang & Liu, 2019 ). System for automated birdsong recognition has been developed considerably (for example, Wood et al, 2022 ; Jäckel et al, 2023 ), and a library of sounds annotated by citizens will contribute to further improving accuracy of automated birdsong recognition.…”