2012
DOI: 10.5304/jafscd.2012.031.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Community-Engaged Learning in Food Systems and Public Health

Abstract: Food preferences, systems, and policies influence the health of individuals and communities both directly, through food consumption choices, and indirectly, through environmental, economic, and social impacts. To aid student understanding of these complex determinants of food choice, a student-driven, community-engaged learning course on food systems and food choices was developed. Guided by the socio-ecological model for health and the goals of the Emory Sustainability Initiative and supported by the Center f… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to facilitate greater adoption and support for SFSE programs, more examples of pedagogical transformations need to be made available for others to identify successful practices and overcome potential challenges that may arise in the different contexts that exist across the spectrum of higher education programs. Self et al (2012) note that despite an increase in SFSE program offerings, there is little critical analysis about approaches to designing and teaching SFSE programs. Similarly, the NRC (2009) states that there is a need for those who have implemented change to report and act as models for those who are interested in attempting similar levels of transformation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In order to facilitate greater adoption and support for SFSE programs, more examples of pedagogical transformations need to be made available for others to identify successful practices and overcome potential challenges that may arise in the different contexts that exist across the spectrum of higher education programs. Self et al (2012) note that despite an increase in SFSE program offerings, there is little critical analysis about approaches to designing and teaching SFSE programs. Similarly, the NRC (2009) states that there is a need for those who have implemented change to report and act as models for those who are interested in attempting similar levels of transformation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In response, there has been rapid growth in North American sustainable agriculture and food systems degree programs, specializations and certificates (Jacobsen et al, 2012; Self et al, 2012; Jordan et al, 2014), which we characterize under the umbrella term of Sustainable Food Systems Education (SFSE). These developments create an opportunity to analyze emergent themes across the programs to articulate a signature pedagogy (SP) for SFSE.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Arrows represent the flow of resources (e.g., money, information, labor, infrastructure, communication); large grey arrows represent the average direction of resources, and small black arrows represent the direction and approximate magnitude of resources transferred between administrators, subject experts, and communities. of practitioners (e.g., policymakers, educators, engineers, advocates, natural and social scientists) with strong community engagement create synergy between policy, communication, education, research, and actions, which is vital to strategic resilience building (e.g., Spoth and Greenberg 2005;Conrad and Hilchey 2011;France and Compton 2012;Virji et al 2012;Melillo et al 2014;Rist et al 2015;Self et al 2016;Patel et al 2017;Ultee et al 2018;Climate Center 2019;Knoepke et al 2019;Krisberg 2019;Posner and Cvitanovic 2019). Recognizing the power of an equitable and holistic approach to resilience building, organizations such as the Union of Concerned Scientists, Global Council for Science and the Environment, and 350.org are embracing strategies that build relationships with communities that are frequently disempowered, through education and outreach, support of public officials who endorse science-informed policies to address global change threats, and/or forging alliances with scholars and practitioners to increase access to vital expertise.…”
Section: Risk Aversionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…That scholarship, however, primarily emphasized earlier course projects that focus inward on enhancing sustainability within the University itself as the means for that kind of civic engagement [42] (p. 118). Grounded in project-based and community-engaged learning approaches [43][44][45], the course engages students with real-world, complex, team-based projects that result in concrete products or outcomes for campus and community sustainability professionals who serve as mentor-partners. Projects focus on the specific challenges and needs of relevance to and identified by these partners to achieve more equitable, co-identified outcomes.…”
Section: Context and Positionalitymentioning
confidence: 99%