2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.physrep.2016.09.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Community detection in networks: A user guide

Abstract: Community detection in networks is one of the most popular topics of modern network science. Communities, or clusters, are usually groups of vertices having higher probability of being connected to each other than to members of other groups, though other patterns are possible. Identifying communities is an ill-defined problem. There are no universal protocols on the fundamental ingredients, like the definition of community itself, nor on other crucial issues, like the validation of algorithms and the compariso… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
1,421
0
14

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,739 publications
(1,441 citation statements)
references
References 173 publications
(261 reference statements)
6
1,421
0
14
Order By: Relevance
“…Several methods exist for the detection of clusters of nodes (communities) in networks (Fortunato and Hric, 2016), and their application to citation networks has been extensively explored (Šubelj et al, 2016). One particularly popular method relies on modularity maximization (Newman and Girvan, 2004), for which a fast implementation exists, known as the Louvain algorithm (Blondel et al, 2008), which has also been extended to incorporate a resolution parameter, helping to tune the size and thus resulting number of clusters (Reichardt and Bornholdt, 2006).…”
Section: The Recent Historiography On Venicementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several methods exist for the detection of clusters of nodes (communities) in networks (Fortunato and Hric, 2016), and their application to citation networks has been extensively explored (Šubelj et al, 2016). One particularly popular method relies on modularity maximization (Newman and Girvan, 2004), for which a fast implementation exists, known as the Louvain algorithm (Blondel et al, 2008), which has also been extended to incorporate a resolution parameter, helping to tune the size and thus resulting number of clusters (Reichardt and Bornholdt, 2006).…”
Section: The Recent Historiography On Venicementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The LFR benchmark is widely used for benchmarking community detection algorithms, as it can be used to generate a wide variety of graphs with ground truth communities [2,4,8]. We briefly describe the LFR benchmark here, for details we refer the reader to the original publications [11,12].…”
Section: Synthetic Graphsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to formalize the fuzzy concept of a community, many quality measures for determining what a good community is and even more algorithms for detecting communities have been proposed. We refer the interested reader to [1][2][3] for an overview.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The discovery of clustering structure in graphs is important as they often correspond to common/latent properties (e.g., interest, role and affiliation) [5]. Although sampling provides a potential solution for inferring and approximating global, latent properties in original graphs, most sampling techniques are not particularly designed to retain the essential property: the inherent clustering structure [12].…”
Section: Clustering Structure In Graphsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Higher value of δ -precision means that the obtained clusters of G s are more precisely representative of the ground-truth clusters of G while higher value of δ -recall indicates the ground-truth clusters of G are more successfully covered by the obtained clusters of G s . Secondly, we also employ several representative metrics widely used for evaluating clusters in the graph including: adjusted Rand index (ARI) [5], normalized mutual information (NMI) [5] and accuracy for number of clusters (ANC) [11] to evaluate the clustering results of the sampled graphs. Note that those metrics are designed solely to assess the clustering quality on the entire graph, not particularly on the sample.…”
Section: Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%