Community compensation in the context of Carbon Capture and Storage: Current debates and practices

Boomsma, Christine; Mors, Emma ter; Jack, Corin; Broecks, Kevin P.F.; Buzoianu, Corina; Cismaru, Diana; Peuchen, Ruben; Piek, Pim; Schumann, Diana; Shackley, Simon; Werker, Jasmin

doi:10.1016/j.ijggc.2020.103128

Cited by 12 publications

(25 citation statements)

References 59 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Since 2019, there has been an increase in acceptance studies investigating the impact of specific industrial CCS applications, such as from cement or steel plants or for the BECCS sector. These studies are often linked to specific project proposals, for example the ALIGN project (It is expected that further scientific publications on the acceptance of iCCUS will be published in 2021 from research projects that have been and will be funded within the framework of Horizon 2020 of the European Commission, such as the ALIGN-CCUS and STRATEGY CCUS projects) [74], and concentrate on regions with industrial clusters that are significant geologically and in terms of their industrial structure with regard to the development of iCCS and are already being scientifically researched in part (compare lines 4 to 6, Table 2).…”

Section: Characteristics Of the Analyzed Articlesmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The concept of Wüstenhagen [80] to classify three different dimensions of social acceptance is mentioned and applied in two articles. Studies that focus their analysis more on the regional or project level often include actor and communication-related approaches, such as the theory of public engagement in [68], the social licence to operate (SLO) in [14,74], the end-to-end stakeholders involvement approach in [67], the concept of procedural fairness in [62], the concept of media agenda-setting in [75], the stakeholder theory for management in [70] and the cognitive theory of shifting coalitions in [73].…”

Section: Characteristics Of the Analyzed Articlesmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Social Acceptance of Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) from Industrial Applications

Witte

2021

Sustainability

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

To limit global warming, the use of carbon capture and storage technologies (CCS) is considered to be of major importance. In addition to the technical–economic, ecological and political aspects, the question of social acceptance is a decisive factor for the implementation of such low-carbon technologies. This study is the first literature review addressing the acceptance of industrial CCS (iCCS). In contrast to electricity generation, the technical options for large-scale reduction of CO2 emissions in the energy-intensive industry sector are not sufficient to achieve the targeted GHG neutrality in the industrial sector without the use of CCS. Therefore, it will be crucial to determine which factors influence the acceptance of iCCS and how these findings can be used for policy and industry decision-making processes. The results show that there has been limited research on the acceptance of iCCS. In addition, the study highlights some important differences between the acceptance of iCCS and CCS. Due to the technical diversity of future iCCS applications, future acceptance research must be able to better address the complexity of the research subject.

show abstract

Section: Characteristics Of the Analyzed Articlesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Characteristics Of the Analyzed Articlesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Social Acceptance of Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) from Industrial Applications

Witte

2021

Sustainability

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…However, developers should be aware that the provision of community benefits does not automatically increase project support. A recent review concluded that compensation schemes for renewable energy projects, among others, are more likely to be acceptable and not perceived as bribery and thus facilitate project support when the compensations fit with local needs and concerns [106]. Thus, developers should identify who the relevant community is (e.g., individuals living close to the proposed infrastructure vs individuals negatively affected by the project), their needs and concerns, and what type of compensation would best match those.…”

Section: Recommendations For Practicementioning

confidence: 99%

“…Compensation alone is usually not that effective and should therefore be combined with wider public engagement strategies, especially by making decision-making processes fairer for the public and increasing trust in responsible developers and authorities [23,106]. For trust to be meaningful in planning processes, it should not simply be utilized to reduce opposition [95].…”

Section: Recommendations For Practicementioning

confidence: 99%

Public Responses to Airborne Wind Energy: A Literature Review

Schmidt

Vries

Renes

et al. 2021

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Airborne wind energy (AWE) systems use tethered flying devices to harvest higher-altitude winds to produce electricity. For a successful deployment of these systems, it is crucial to understand how the public perceives them. If public concerns about the technology are not taken seriously, implementation could be delayed or, in some cases, prevented, resulting in increased costs for project developers and a lower contribution of the sector to renewable energy targets. This literature review assessed the current state of knowledge on public responses to AWE. An exhaustive literature search led to the identification of 40 relevant publications that were reviewed. The literature assumed that the safety, visibility, acoustic emissions, ecological impacts, and the siting of AWE systems shape public responses to the technology. The reviewed literature views people’s responses to AWE very optimistically but lacks scientific evidence to back up its claims. It seems to overlook that the influence of AWE’s characteristics (e.g., visibility) on public responses will also depend on a range of situational and psychological factors (e.g., people’s general attitude towards AWE, the public’s trust in project developers). Therefore, empirical social scientific research is needed to increase the field’s understanding of public responses to AWE and thereby facilitate deployment.

show abstract

“…The increased global awareness of the effect of CO 2 on the climate has renewed the interest in carbon capture and storage (CCS) technologies for the reduction of CO 2 emissions relative to historic emissions; these innovative technologies aim to achieve a lower relative rise in global mean temperature (GMT) long-term [1]. Though the accurate prediction of the thermodynamic properties of CO 2 -rich mixtures is critical in terms of design calculations for the selectivity, costing, and safety of operations, improper property prediction will have an adverse effect on a project's economic feasibility in regards to overdesign or lack thereof [2,3].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Assessment of Cubic Equations of State: Machine Learning for Rich Carbon-Dioxide Systems

2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Carbon capture and storage (CCS) has attracted renewed interest in the re-evaluation of the equations of state (EoS) for the prediction of thermodynamic properties. This study also evaluates EoS for Peng–Robinson (PR) and Soave–Redlich–Kwong (SRK) and their capability to predict the thermodynamic properties of CO2-rich mixtures. The investigation was carried out using machine learning such as an artificial neural network (ANN) and a classified learner. A lower average absolute relative deviation (AARD) of 7.46% was obtained for the PR in comparison with SRK (AARD = 15.0%) for three components system of CO2 with N2 and CH4. Moreover, it was found to be 13.5% for PR and 19.50% for SRK in the five components’ (CO2 with N2, CH4, Ar, and O2) case. In addition, applying machine learning provided promise and valuable insight to deal with engineering problems. The implementation of machine learning in conjunction with EoS led to getting lower predictive AARD in contrast to EoS. An of AARD 2.81% was achieved for the three components and 12.2% for the respective five components mixture.

show abstract

Community compensation in the context of Carbon Capture and Storage: Current debates and practices

Cited by 12 publications

References 59 publications

Social Acceptance of Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) from Industrial Applications

Social Acceptance of Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) from Industrial Applications

Public Responses to Airborne Wind Energy: A Literature Review

Assessment of Cubic Equations of State: Machine Learning for Rich Carbon-Dioxide Systems

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About