Community Capacity Building and Sustainability: Outcomes of Community-Based Participatory Research

Abstract

Background For communities, the value of community-based participatory research (CBPR) is often manifested in the outcomes of increased capacity and sustainable adoption of evidence-based practices for social change. Educational opportunities that promote discourse between community and academic partners can help to advance CBPR and better define these outcomes. Objectives This paper describes a community–academic conference to develop shared definitions of community capacity building and sustainability related to CBPR and to identify obstacles and facilitators to both. Methods “Taking It to the Curbside: Engaging Communities to Create Sustainable Change for Health” was planned by five Clinical Translational Science Institutes and four community organizations. After a keynote presentation, breakout groups of community and academic members met to define community capacity building and sustainability, and to identify facilitators and barriers to achieving both. Groups were facilitated by researcher–community partner teams and conversations were recorded and transcribed. Qualitative analysis for thematic content was conducted by a subset of the planning committee. Results Important findings included learning that (1) the concepts of capacity and sustainability were considered interconnected; (2) partnership was perceived as both a facilitator and an outcome of CBPR; (3) sustainability was linked to “transfer of knowledge” from one generation to another within a community; and (4) capacity and sustainability were enhanced when goals were shared and health outcomes were achieved. Conclusions Community capacity building and sustainability are key outcomes of CBPR for communities. Co-learning opportunities that engage and mutually educate both community members and academics can be useful strategies for identifying meaningful strategies to achieve these outcomes.

Community Based Programs Sustainability. A Multidimensional Analysis of Sustainability Factors

“…(4) Community capacity [6,7,9,15] describes community capability in terms of target group availability.…”

“…Community based programs are increasingly scrutinized in the literature literature [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15] in the broader context of non-profit sector sustainability [16,17]. There are several reasons why program sustainability is important: (1) terminating an effective program leads to negative effects for both the community involved and for host organization; (2) program initiation costs are high; and (3) community experiencing unexpected program termination lose trust when future programs are to be introduced [18].…”

A Mixed-Methods Outcome Evaluation of a Mentorship Intervention for Canadian Nurses in HIV Care

“…Community-based research has the potential to contribute to capacity building and community development (Caine & Mill, 2016;Hacker et al, 2012;Israel et al, 2010) and to benefit both the research endeavor and the stakeholders involved (Flicker, Savan, Kolenda, Mildenberger, 2007). Our inclusion of PLWH as co-investigators and advisors to this research, as well as PLWH mentor participants, ensured that the research was grounded in Greater Involvement of People living with AIDS principles (Travers et al, 2008).…”

The Urban Food Hubs Solution: Building Capacity in Urban Communities

“…Without the engagement of local experts, local contexts will be misrepresented, underrepresented, or omitted altogether (O'Hara, 1996;Raja & Diao, 2016;Hacker et al, 2012). A Five Pillars study for Washington D.C. is currently under way and will be released in 2017.…”