Community-based surveillance of infectious diseases: a systematic review of drivers of success

Abstract

IntroductionCommunity-based surveillance may improve early detection and response to disease outbreaks by leveraging the capacity of community members to carry out surveillance activities within their communities. In 2021, the WHO published a report detailing the evidence gaps and research priorities around community-centred approaches to health emergencies. In response, we carried out a systematic review and narrative synthesis of the evidence describing the drivers of success of community-based surveillance systems.MethodsWe included grey literature and peer-reviewed sources presenting empirical findings of the drivers of success of community-based surveillance systems for the detection and reporting of infectious disease-related events. We searched for peer-reviewed literature via MEDLINE, EMBASE, Global Health, SCOPUS and ReliefWeb. We carried out grey literature searches using Google Search and DuckDuckGo. We used an evaluation quality checklist to assess quality.ResultsNineteen sources (17 peer-reviewed and 2 grey literature) met our inclusion criteria. Included sources reported on community-based surveillance for the detection and reporting of a variety of diseases in 15 countries (including three conflict settings). The drivers of success were grouped based on factors relating to: (1) surveillance workers, (2) the community, (3) case detection and reporting, (4) and integration.DiscussionThe drivers of success were found to map closely to principles of participatory community engagement with success factors reflecting high levels of acceptability, collaboration, communication, local ownership, and trust. Other factors included: strong supervision and training, a strong sense of responsibility for community health, effective engagement of community informants, close proximity of surveillance workers to communities, the use of simple and adaptable case definitions, quality assurance, effective use of technology, and the use of data for real-time decision-making. Our findings highlight strategies for improving the design and implementation of community-based surveillance. We suggest that investment in participatory community engagement more broadly may be a key surveillance preparedness activity.PROSPERO registration numberCRD42022303971.

Community interventions for pandemic preparedness: A scoping review of pandemic preparedness lessons from HIV, COVID-19, and other public health emergencies of international concern

“…The range of CHW functions described was diverse, including formal delivery of health services, through to counselling and care navigation (in directing people to other sources of support) [ 32 , 69 ]. However, wider factors such as the supervision and training of community-based surveillance workers, and the extent of integration with other surveillance systems also appear to be important in determining the success of these approaches [ 118 ].…”

Community-based surveillance programme evaluation using the platform Nyss implemented by the Somali Red Crescent society – a mixed methods approach

“…This resulted in a sense of ownership that was evident during the qualitative interviews. Strong community engagement has been shown to be a key factor in the project implementation (2) and was recognised by McGowen et al as one of the "drivers of success" for CBS (23). An expansion of the programme was requested by all stakeholders, further demonstrating the high acceptance.…”

“…The CBS strategy was then developed by RCRC members in collaboration with national and regional MoHD and the community with the objective of detecting and warning authorities early on potential health risks at community level to facilitate rapid response to prevent large scale epidemics. RCRC members followed principles of CBS implementation later described by McGowan et al (23) that identi ed drivers of CBS programme success, including engagement of community, local ownership and trust, strong supervision and training, simple and adaptable case de nitions.…”

Evaluation of a multi-component early warning system for pastoralist populations in Doolo zone, Ethiopia: mixed-methods study

“…Such approaches might improve expectation-setting and overall acceptability, as these would mean MSF teams would interact consistently with key decision makers within their preferred contexts. Communication and community engagement have been identi ed as key success factors for community based surveillance (CBS) and particularly in relation to clear and consistent community feedback, which the Tea team surveillance system was lacking (2,11) . This issue could have been addressed at design phase and ultimately might improve overall system functioning and acceptability.…”

“…Among the 58 alerts, 46 were triggered by CEBS, 11 by OEBS, and 1 by CIBS (Table 4). Most alerts were population movements (15), followed by suspected AWD (14) and suspected measles (11).…”