2014
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-54370-8_28
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Community-Based Scholar Recommendation Modeling in Academic Social Network Sites

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…But the process of extracting the occurrence and position of each reference can be very time-consuming. Similar to citation network, Jiemin Chen et al put forward a community-based scholar commendation model [5], which needs constructing research-fields-based graphs firstly, detecting communities in the graphs and then making scholar recommendation by calculating friendship scores. The experimental results demonstrated that the approach outperforms the content-based user recommendation method .…”
Section: Citation Network-based Recommendation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But the process of extracting the occurrence and position of each reference can be very time-consuming. Similar to citation network, Jiemin Chen et al put forward a community-based scholar commendation model [5], which needs constructing research-fields-based graphs firstly, detecting communities in the graphs and then making scholar recommendation by calculating friendship scores. The experimental results demonstrated that the approach outperforms the content-based user recommendation method .…”
Section: Citation Network-based Recommendation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are some previous works that are similar to our study. For example, in [29], a research-fields-based graph in ASNs was built, and a community-based scholar recommendation model was proposed [30]. The previous study was extended by processing the problem of subset community through the GraphChi framework in parallel and recommending the scholars within the community according to the relevant recommendation rules [10].…”
Section: Scholar Recommendationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In its 2014 survey, Nature (Van Noorden, 2014: 127) reported that:The most-selected activity on both ResearchGate and Academia.edu was simply maintaining a profile in case someone wanted to get in touch – suggesting that many researchers regard their profiles as a way to boost their professional presence online. After that, the most popular options involved posting content related to work, discovering related peers, tracking metrics and finding recommended research papers. Chen et al (2014: 325) have suggested that ‘Large amounts of users hope to make friends with other users for potential academic collaborations in ASNSs’. Like Van Noorden, Levy et al (2016: 63) have highlighted the use of ASNS for ‘career development, paper distribution and short-term interactions’ rather than for long-term social interactions.…”
Section: Related Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%