2009
DOI: 10.1353/cpr.0.0072
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Community-Based Participatory Research in Little Haiti: Challenges and Lessons Learned

Abstract: Partnerships are fostered over time through demonstrated mutual commitment to improving health and building community capacity. Communities must play an active role throughout the research process to ensure that studies are culturally relevant, and ensuing intervention, sustainable.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
26
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Yet, the documented challenges do not bring out the social or structural deterrents pertaining to the nature of the community context where the research takes place. The obstacles to 'participation' cited in the literature pertain to the research process itself, and include complaints from the community about the nature of the research process conducted on the community members rather than with them; inadequate information about results and their utility (Christopher et al, 2008); researchers 'parachuting' into communities to conduct research without providing feedback or assistance (Buchanan et al, 2007); putting ideas of community members into boxes to be examined (Minkler, 2005) and the difficulty of the research language (Kobetz et al, 2009;Weeks et al, 2010). Other issues relate to the researcher-community interaction.…”
Section: Cbpr and Related Conceptsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yet, the documented challenges do not bring out the social or structural deterrents pertaining to the nature of the community context where the research takes place. The obstacles to 'participation' cited in the literature pertain to the research process itself, and include complaints from the community about the nature of the research process conducted on the community members rather than with them; inadequate information about results and their utility (Christopher et al, 2008); researchers 'parachuting' into communities to conduct research without providing feedback or assistance (Buchanan et al, 2007); putting ideas of community members into boxes to be examined (Minkler, 2005) and the difficulty of the research language (Kobetz et al, 2009;Weeks et al, 2010). Other issues relate to the researcher-community interaction.…”
Section: Cbpr and Related Conceptsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, engaging the community in each step of the scientific enquiry helps to facilitate positive change (Green & Mercer 2001), and brings in a diverse group of stakeholders to co-own a solution that matters and makes sense to them. Hence, implementation will more likely be sustained (Kobetz et al 2009;Martinez, Carter-Pokras & Broan 2009;Minkler 2005;Okubo & Weidman 2000). In addition, given the complexity of health determinants and the disparities experienced …”
Section: Background Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We focused on building long-term relationships in the community through educational service projects and participatory research (Juliá and Kondrat 2005;Kobetz et al 2009;Vandebroek 2013). Crosscultural experiential educational sessions were organized and led by experts from Jamaica, Ghana, and the United States.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%