Community-Based Participatory Research and Community Health Development

Burdine, James N.; McLeroy, Kenneth R.; Blakely, Craig; Wendel, Monica L.; Felix, Michael R. J.

doi:10.1007/s10935-010-0205-9

Cited by 28 publications

(20 citation statements)

References 4 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…For those interested in more comprehensive evaluation aspects, questions can also be added to determine what types of standardized outcome measures would be feasible to collect in the dissemination of EBDPs conducted outside of a research setting. Seeking such input from the field aligns with the recent emphasis on person-centered research, which stresses the importance of including major stakeholders in research ( 35 ).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 91%

Perceived Utility of the RE-AIM Framework for Health Promotion/Disease Prevention Initiatives for Older Adults: A Case Study from the U.S. Evidence-Based Disease Prevention Initiative

Ory

Altpeter

Belza

et al. 2015

Front. Public Health

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Dissemination and implementation (D&I) frameworks are increasingly being promoted in public health research. However, less is known about their uptake in the field, especially for diverse sets of programs. Limited questionnaires exist to assess the ways that frameworks can be utilized in program planning and evaluation. We present a case study from the United States that describes the implementation of the RE-AIM framework by state aging services providers and public health partners and a questionnaire that can be used to assess the utility of such frameworks in practice. An online questionnaire was developed to capture community perspectives about the utility of the RE-AIM framework. Distributed to project leads in 27 funded states in an evidence-based disease prevention initiative for older adults, 40 key stakeholders responded representing a 100% state-participation rate among the 27 funded states. Findings suggest that there is perceived utility in using the RE-AIM framework when evaluating grand-scale initiatives for older adults. The RE-AIM framework was seen as useful for planning, implementation, and evaluation with relevance for evaluators, providers, community leaders, and policy makers. Yet, the uptake was not universal, and some respondents reported difficulties in use, especially adopting the framework as a whole. This questionnaire can serve as the basis to assess ways the RE-AIM framework can be utilized by practitioners in state-wide D&I efforts. Maximal benefit can be derived from examining the assessment of RE-AIM-related knowledge and confidence as part of a continual quality assurance process. We recommend such an assessment be performed before the implementation of new funding initiatives and throughout their course to assess RE-AIM uptake and to identify areas for technical assistance.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 91%

Perceived Utility of the RE-AIM Framework for Health Promotion/Disease Prevention Initiatives for Older Adults: A Case Study from the U.S. Evidence-Based Disease Prevention Initiative

Ory

Altpeter

Belza

et al. 2015

Front. Public Health

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Past reports have shown CDSME programs have capacity to serve large numbers of heterogeneous adults via a growing network of delivery sites ( 8 , 12 , 20 , 21 ). Success can be attributed, in part, to a community-driven delivery system that employed existing networks for recruiting participants of varied ages, race/ethnicity; disease status; geographic region; and socio-economic status ( 22 ). However, additional efforts are needed to help CDSME programs gain major penetration among the over 35 million older Americans estimated to have at least one chronic condition ( 23 ).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

National Dissemination of Chronic Disease Self-Management Education Programs: An Incremental Examination of Delivery Characteristics

Smith

Ory

Ahn

et al. 2015

Front. Public Health

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

With a near 20-year developmental history as an evidence-based program, the suite of Chronic Disease Self-Management Education (CDSME) programs were selected in 2010 for grand-scale dissemination in a federally supported initiative to improve the health of older Americans. The primary charge of this national effort was to establish a sustainable program delivery system for empowering American adults with one or more chronic conditions to better manage their health. The current study focused on a series of dissemination and implementation science research questions to: (1) examine the geographic distribution of participation in this initiative across the Unites States; (2) describe workshop characteristics engaged to reach program participants in various settings; and (3) describe personal characteristics of the first 100,000 participants. Each subsequent entering cohort was descriptively examined to indicate whether there was constancy or change in delivery sites and populations reached over time. Findings show a strengthening of the workshop delivery infrastructure in that it took 9.4 months to reach the first 25,000 participants in 853 counties compared to 5.4 months to reach the last 25,000 participants in 1,109 counties. The workshop delivery characteristics and participant characteristics remained relatively consistent across increments of 25,000 participants reached, although general trends were observed for some variables. For example, after reaching the first 25,000 participants, subsequent groups of 25,000 participants were reached more quickly. Additionally, workshops were increasingly delivered in ZIP Codes with higher percentages of families residing below the federal poverty line. As more participants were reached, more participants with chronic conditions were enrolled. This national translational study illustrates the rapid expansion of CDSME programs throughout the United States and capability to reach diverse populations in a variety of settings.

show abstract

“…It is foremost a collaboration between the community or agency of interest and the researcher, as an endeavor to engage in action that responds to challenges and potentially enacts change. [25][26][27] The approach "integrates education and social action to improve health and reduce health disparities." 27 readily be shaped to address outcomes for individuals and/or populations.…”

Section: Apc and Cbparmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Table 3 provides a summarized list of the guiding values for the collaboration, adapted from contemporary APC and CBPAR scholars' work. [24][25][26] EXEMPLAR On the basis of the CBPAR and APC principles, community nursing professionals and nursing academicians agreed to take concrete steps that would support extending caring services across the community. The academic institution already had a formal affiliation agreement with the local hospital.…”

Section: Apc and Cbparmentioning

confidence: 99%

Caring Across the Continuum

Dyess

Opalinski

Saiswick³

et al. 2016

Nursing Administration Quarterly

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

As health reform continues to advance, there is a need for nurse leaders to broaden their perspective related to possible nursing practice models and potential community partners in order to successfully address caring, accomplish the triple aim mandate, and achieve suitable metrics for maximum reimbursement. Intentional efforts must be made by nurse leaders to maximize caring and ensure that professional nurses are responding to the key drivers shifting health care delivery in the 21st century. Academic-practice collaboration (APC) and community-based participatory action research (CBPAR) align well. Together, they provide an ideal mechanism to pursue endeavors that extend evidence for caring services across the health care continuum. One APC/CBPAR model for community outreach that can maximize individual and population health outcomes is highlighted in this article. Furthermore, useful action steps are offered that could be taken by a nurse leader to develop and maintain any form of APC/CBPAR in order to manifest values through caring action across the health care continuum.

show abstract

Community-Based Participatory Research and Community Health Development

Cited by 28 publications

References 4 publications

Perceived Utility of the RE-AIM Framework for Health Promotion/Disease Prevention Initiatives for Older Adults: A Case Study from the U.S. Evidence-Based Disease Prevention Initiative

Perceived Utility of the RE-AIM Framework for Health Promotion/Disease Prevention Initiatives for Older Adults: A Case Study from the U.S. Evidence-Based Disease Prevention Initiative

National Dissemination of Chronic Disease Self-Management Education Programs: An Incremental Examination of Delivery Characteristics

Caring Across the Continuum

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About