Community-Based Group Physical Activity and/or Nutrition Interventions to Promote Health and Mobility in Older Adults: An Umbrella Review

Neil-Sztramko, Sarah; Teggart, Kylie; Moore, Caroline; Sherifali, Diana; Fitzpatrick‐Lewis, Donna; Coletta, Giulia; Phillips, Stuart M.; Newbold, K. Bruce; Álvarez, Elizabeth; Kuspinar, Ayse; Kennedy, Courtney; Santaguida, Lina; Ganann, Rebecca

doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-578194/v1

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 5 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…During the evaluation period, SGC members worked with researchers to provide input to a variety of knowledge translation products including infographics [47,48], manuscripts [49,50], training and program materials, research briefs [51,52], and the study website. SGC members have co-authored and co-presented webinars and academic conference presentations with EMBOLDEN researchers.…”

Section: Translational Impactsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Evaluating the impact of engaging older adults and service providers as research partners in the co-design of a community mobility-promoting program: A multi-method developmental evaluation study

MacNeil,

Abelson,

Moore

et al. 2023

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: Increasingly researchers are partnering with citizens and communities in research; less is known about research impacts of this engagement. EMBOLDEN is an evidence-informed, mobility-promoting intervention for older adults co-designed by a 28-person Strategic Guiding Council (SGC) of health/social service providers and older adult citizens. This study evaluated research partners’ perceptions of engagement strategies, the engagement context, strengths, areas for improvement, as well as the impacts of the guiding council on older-adult identified priority areas. Methods: This study was guided by developmental evaluation, working in partnership with four older adult SGC members who helped to set evaluation priorities, decide methods, and adapt patient-centred evaluation tools. Data sources included a survey, focus groups and document analysis of meeting notes from 16 SGC meetings that took place between December 2019 and February 2022. A thematic approach to analysis guided the coding of focus group transcripts and SGC meeting notes. Results: Of 26 SGC members, nine completed the evaluation survey, and five participated in focus groups. Around two thirds of the SGC commonly attended each meeting. EMBOLDEN’s SGC was structured to include a diverse group (across gender, ethnicity and discipline) of older adults and service providers, which was perceived as a strength. Engagement processes were perceived as inclusive and well-facilitated, which stimulated discussion at meetings. Advantages and disadvantages of engaging with the SGC virtually, as compared to in-person (as was the case for the first 3 SGC meetings) were also discussed. Impacts of the SGC were identified across preparatory, execution phase and translational stages of research. Impacts of SGC involvement on members were also described. Conclusion: Older adult research partners played an important role designing, implementing, and evaluating co-design approaches in this study. Older adults and service providers can make important contributions to the design, delivery and sharing results of health research through their lived expertise and connections to community. This project contributes to the growing field of citizen and community engagement in research by offering a participatory approach to engagement evaluation that considers diversity, satisfaction, and impact.

show abstract