2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2018.12.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Community-acquired pneumonia in children: cell-free plasma sequencing for diagnosis and management

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
49
3

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
2
49
3
Order By: Relevance
“…In patients whose final clinical diagnosis was viral pneumonia, the BALF mNGS detected more sequences than blood in our study, which was consistent with previous studies that showed a higher level of CMV DNA detected in BALF compared with the blood using real-time PCR [25,26]. Pathogen DNA in blood may also reflect the pulmonary infection because high blood flow in the lung may lead to increased pathogen DNA shedding [18]. In the 16 patients whose diagnoses were confirmed by culture, mNGS detected additional microbes including Enterococcus faecium, Pneumocystis jirovecii, Acinetobacter baumannii, Streptococcus pneumoniae, Candida glabrata, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenzae, Candida parapsilosis, and Aspergillus fumigatus.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In patients whose final clinical diagnosis was viral pneumonia, the BALF mNGS detected more sequences than blood in our study, which was consistent with previous studies that showed a higher level of CMV DNA detected in BALF compared with the blood using real-time PCR [25,26]. Pathogen DNA in blood may also reflect the pulmonary infection because high blood flow in the lung may lead to increased pathogen DNA shedding [18]. In the 16 patients whose diagnoses were confirmed by culture, mNGS detected additional microbes including Enterococcus faecium, Pneumocystis jirovecii, Acinetobacter baumannii, Streptococcus pneumoniae, Candida glabrata, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenzae, Candida parapsilosis, and Aspergillus fumigatus.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Studies have shown that blood culture should not be recommended even in severe pulmonary infections due to its extremely low yield [15,16]. Contrary to this, molecular diagnostic methods such as polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and mNGS have been proven feasible in blood samples to detect pathogens in pulmonary infections [17,18]. As an evolutional diagnostic tool, the positive rate of BALF and blood mNGS in pulmonary infections is still unknown.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Only 6/36 (17%) studies reported use of a positive control, including using a mixture of 7 representative organisms and a single Corynebacterium glutamicum ATCC 13032 positive control. 6,16,18,30,42,49 Sequencing technologies Illumina sequencing was used exclusively in 50% (18/36) studies ( Supplementary Table S3).…”
Section: Methodology: Controlsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most commonly used method include a parametric approach based on an assumed distribution for contaminating reads informed by numbers of reads in the control and other samples (n=6). [16][17][18]24,30,40 Some studies (n=5) took an empirical approach to setting these absolute thresholds based on sequencing known negative and positive samples 3,6,39,42,49 while, other studies developed composite measures to determine contamination using factors such as absolute and percentage reads, DNA quantity and relative importance of bacteria among others (n=5). [27][28][29]38,50 Seven studies primarily identified contamination manually from known literature or if reported to be a contaminant previously in the local laboratory.…”
Section: Assessing True Species Presence Versus Contaminationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…in preterm labor, β-thalassemia, and fetal aneuploidy [26][27][28]. Most recently, we have validated a new laboratory developed clinical diagnostic test, the Karius 1 Test, and showed that DNA sequencing of cell-free plasma can accurately detect microbial cfDNA in bloodstream infections and deep seated infections [29,30].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%