Abstract:In this paper we define a type of cohesive subgroups -called communities -in hypergraphs, based on the edge connectivity of subhypergraphs. We describe a simple algorithm for the construction of these sets and show, based on examples from image segmentation and information retrieval, that these groups may be useful for the analysis and accessibility of large graphs and hypergraphs.
“…Hence, modulo re-labeling of vertices and the removal of white non-vertex faces, we must have a subdivision drawing as the one depicted in Fig. 5(a) with a non-simple hyperedge region for hyperedge (2,3,4). Second, consider the hypergraph H 2 that is schematically depicted in Fig.…”
Section: Observation 1 a Hypergraph H (I) Has A Simple Subdivision Dmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In relational databases there is a natural correspondence between database schemata and hypergraphs, with attributes corresponding to vertices and relations to hyperedges [7]. Hypergraphs are used in VLSI design for circuit visualization [6,14] and also appear in computational biology [10,12] and social networks [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2(a, b)). Concerning vertex-planarity, consider the following hypergraph H: H has six vertices and three hyperedges (1, 2, 3, 4), (1,2,3,5), and (1, 2, 3, 6). H is vertex-planar but not (Zykov-)planar.…”
Abstract. We introduce the concept of subdivision drawings of hypergraphs. In a subdivision drawing each vertex corresponds uniquely to a face of a planar subdivision and, for each hyperedge, the union of the faces corresponding to the vertices incident to that hyperedge is connected. Vertex-based Venn diagrams and concrete Euler diagrams are both subdivision drawings. In this paper we study two new types of subdivision drawings which are more general than concrete Euler diagrams and more restricted than vertex-based Venn diagrams. They allow us to draw more hypergraphs than the former while having better aesthetic properties than the latter.
“…Hence, modulo re-labeling of vertices and the removal of white non-vertex faces, we must have a subdivision drawing as the one depicted in Fig. 5(a) with a non-simple hyperedge region for hyperedge (2,3,4). Second, consider the hypergraph H 2 that is schematically depicted in Fig.…”
Section: Observation 1 a Hypergraph H (I) Has A Simple Subdivision Dmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In relational databases there is a natural correspondence between database schemata and hypergraphs, with attributes corresponding to vertices and relations to hyperedges [7]. Hypergraphs are used in VLSI design for circuit visualization [6,14] and also appear in computational biology [10,12] and social networks [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2(a, b)). Concerning vertex-planarity, consider the following hypergraph H: H has six vertices and three hyperedges (1, 2, 3, 4), (1,2,3,5), and (1, 2, 3, 6). H is vertex-planar but not (Zykov-)planar.…”
Abstract. We introduce the concept of subdivision drawings of hypergraphs. In a subdivision drawing each vertex corresponds uniquely to a face of a planar subdivision and, for each hyperedge, the union of the faces corresponding to the vertices incident to that hyperedge is connected. Vertex-based Venn diagrams and concrete Euler diagrams are both subdivision drawings. In this paper we study two new types of subdivision drawings which are more general than concrete Euler diagrams and more restricted than vertex-based Venn diagrams. They allow us to draw more hypergraphs than the former while having better aesthetic properties than the latter.
“…For example, there is a natural correspondence between hypergraphs and database schemata in relational databases, with vertices corresponding to attributes and hyperedges to relations (e.g., see [2]). Further applications include VLSI design [13], computational biology [12], and social networks [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, vertex-based Venn diagrams [9] and concrete Euler diagrams [7] are both subdivision drawings. (2,3,4,5), (1,3,4,6,7), (6,7,8,9)}.…”
A graph G is a support for a hypergraph H = (V, S) if the vertices of G correspond to the vertices of H such that for each hyperedge S i ∈ S the subgraph of G induced by S i is connected. G is a planar support if it is a support and planar. Johnson and Pollak [9] proved that it is NPcomplete to decide if a given hypergraph has a planar support. In contrast, there are polynomial time algorithms to test whether a given hypergraph has a planar support that is a path, cycle, or tree. In this paper we present an algorithm which tests in polynomial time if a given hypergraph has a planar support that is a tree where the maximal degree of each vertex is bounded. Our algorithm is constructive and computes a support if it exists. Furthermore, we prove that it is already NP-hard to decide if a hypergraph has a 2-outerplanar support.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.