2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.lcsi.2012.04.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Communities, boundary practices and incentives for knowledge sharing?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For these activities to be successful, practitioners should support employees in their specific units of activities. In other words, various types of digitized systems and facilitating triggers should be identified to help members change naturally in their work (Anna-Carin and Roger, 2012).…”
Section: Practical Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For these activities to be successful, practitioners should support employees in their specific units of activities. In other words, various types of digitized systems and facilitating triggers should be identified to help members change naturally in their work (Anna-Carin and Roger, 2012).…”
Section: Practical Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, in these reforms, school learning is no longer seen as merely repeating what is already known but involves transformations in which something new and formerly unknown is created (e.g., Säljö 2012). Here, learning is understood not as something that takes place exclusively in the restricted spaces of formal education (Hughes, Jewson, and Unwin 2007;Ramsten and Säljö 2012); instead learning is situated within a matrix of contexts including formal and informal, local and global, embodied and virtual, as well as distributed and integrated.…”
Section: What Might 21st-century Pedagogy and Learning Look Like?mentioning
confidence: 99%