Communitarianism

Franco, Raquel Campos; Wang, Lili; O’Rourke, Pauric; Breeze, Beth; Künzl, Jan; Govekar, Chris; Biggers, Christopher S.; Bour, Odile; Hölz, Martin; List, Regina; Real, Carlos Cordourier; Kraeger, Patsy; Lingelbach, Gabriele; O’Halloran, Kerry; Pospı́šil, Miroslav; Griffin, Christopher L.; Robichau, Robbie Waters; Liedhegener, Antonius; Martı́nez, Francisco; Gosewinkel, Dieter; Moro, Giovanni; Fowler, Alan; Halman, Loek; Dacombe, Rod; Levi, Elizabeth; Irish, Leon E.; Lange, Dirk; Isar, Yudhishthir Raj; Howard, Marc Morjé; Romanienko, Lisiunia A.; Reynolds, Travis; Seckinelgin, Hakan; Juergensmeyer, Mark; Lyons, Mark; Nowland-Foreman, Garth; Filho, Marco Antonio Figueiredo Milani; Viana, Marcia Serra Ribeiro; Czike, Klára; Yachkaschi, Schirin; Toogood-Luehrs, Kimairis; Chan, Kin-man; Kanyinga, Karuti; Tsujinaka, Yutaka; Park, Tae-Kyu; Hwang, Chang-Soon; Natal, Alejandro; Cadena-Roa, Jorge; Rappoport, Sara Gordon; Liverani, Andrea; Gilbert, Leah; Sivesind, Karl Henrik; Selle, Per; Roitter, Mario; Blomkvist, Hans; Uba, Katrin; Weiss, Meredith; Boje, Thomas P.; Saber, Alaa; Milofsky, Carl; Klie, Thomas; Kocka, Jürgen; Brauer, Kai; Kohler‐Koch, Beate; Rajagopal, Arvind; Molnár, Gábor; Sarles, Curtis; Davies, Thomas; Bauerkämper, Arnd; Kostovicova, Denisa; Heinrich, V. Finn; Sulek, Marty; Mukherjee, Dhrubodhi; Kuruvilla, Shyama; Malešević, Siniša; Malešević, Vesna; Katz, Hagai; Rucht, Dieter; Schmidt, Jürgen; Puga, Cristina; Klein, Ansgar; Powell, Fred; Opitz-Belakhal, Claudia; Adloff, Frank; Hill, Lisa; Brinton, Aspen; Obadare, Ebenezer; Keane, John; Meyer, Megan; Stacey, Simon; Austin, James E.; Ebrahim, Alnoor; Anheier, Helmut K.; Krieger, Kristian; Gugerty, Mary Kay; Lotz, Jim; Fox, Jonathan; Vrielink, Mirjan Oude; Montfort, Cor van; Marx, Johannes; Pfaff, Steve; Valdez, Sarah; Labigne, Anael; Tuckman, Howard P.; Schortgen, Alicia; Turnour, Matthew; McGregor-Lowndes, Myles; Lohmann, Roger A.; Etzioni, Amitaï; Park, Sang Peel; McQuarrie, Michael; Cumming, Lawrence S.; Hale, Sharilyn; Spear, Roger; Zhu, Xiaoyan; Knoke, David; Douglas, Heather; Yunis, Feisal A.; Eck, Steve Van; Rehli, Florian; Smith, Steven Rathgeb; Jones, Derek C.; Kalmi, Panu; Altman, Morris; Nährlich, Stefan; Filipovitch, Anthony; Moore, Jessica; Stephenson, Max; Croce, Mariano; Reaves, Allyson; MacPherson, Ian; Brainard, Lori A.

doi:10.1007/978-0-387-93996-4_66

International Encyclopedia of Civil Society 2010

DOI: 10.1007/978-0-387-93996-4_66

|View full text |Cite

Communitarianism

Raquel Campos Franco¹,

Lili Wang²,

Pauric O’Rourke³

et al.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Year Published

2020

Publication Types

Select...

Article1

Relationship

Self Cite0

Independent1

Authors

Journals

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…In the Asian tradition, communitarianism argues that individual rights and political freedoms must be curtailed to maintain social harmony. There is thus a contradiction here that seems to lead to polarization or ambiguity among the respondents (Etzioni 2010). The civil and equal rights-cluster (II) is described as successful, chosen, fair and free.…”

mentioning

confidence: 95%

Measuring meanings of democracy—methods of differentiation

Osterberg-Kaufmann

Stadelmaier²

2020

Z Vgl Polit Wiss

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The question of the contested nature of the concept of democracy is neither in doubt within the political science debate, nor new. What is new, however, is the attention paid to the knowledge of competing ideas of democracy in literature. The development of concepts of the “D-word” beyond Eurocentric hegemony was accompanied by a critical review of methodological approaches. Against the background of these methodological challenges, the requirements for more differentiated or mixed methodological approaches are discussed in the literature. In this article, a combined approach of the repertory grid and the semantic differential methods is proposed to enrich the innovative methodological dynamics of investigating the meaning of democracy. The article gives an introduction to the repertory grid method and illustrates, with a case study, how the Singaporean middle-class views democracy. These repertory grid face-to-face interviews serve as a starting point for the creation of valid polarity profiles for the semantic differential method—a method which, like the repertory grid, is used to measure the connotative or affective meaning of objects, but in a quantitative design so that representativeness can be achieved. Through this approach, the constructivist approach of repertory grid is partly combined with positivistic survey research, and thus the approach is inductive with deductive research.

show abstract

mentioning

confidence: 95%

Measuring meanings of democracy—methods of differentiation

Osterberg-Kaufmann

Stadelmaier²

2020

Z Vgl Polit Wiss

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.

Contact Info

hi@scite.ai

10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614

Henderson, NV 89052, USA

Blog Terms and Conditions API Terms Privacy Policy Contact Cookie Preferences Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information

Made with 💙 for researchers

Part of the Research Solutions Family.

Communitarianism

Cited by 1 publication

References 0 publications

Measuring meanings of democracy—methods of differentiation

Measuring meanings of democracy—methods of differentiation

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About