1965
DOI: 10.1037/h0022389
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Communicator importance and interpersonal attitudes toward conforming and deviant group members.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

1966
1966
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The post hoc attenuation interpretation is consistent with the results of two studies by Streufert (1965Streufert ( , 1966. He found that subjects' negative evaluations of deviant (i.e., attitudinally dissimilar) group members and their positive evaluations of conforming (Le., attitudindy similar) group members were accentuated by decreases in the hypothetical interaction distance between the subject and the respective group members.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…The post hoc attenuation interpretation is consistent with the results of two studies by Streufert (1965Streufert ( , 1966. He found that subjects' negative evaluations of deviant (i.e., attitudinally dissimilar) group members and their positive evaluations of conforming (Le., attitudindy similar) group members were accentuated by decreases in the hypothetical interaction distance between the subject and the respective group members.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…Evidence supporting this proposition has been provided by Schachter (1951), Festinger and Thibaut (1951), Howard (1959), Festinger et al (1952), Back (1951), Gerard (1953, and Lott and Lott (1961). Related findings were reported by Streufert (1965), who found attitudes toward a deviant became more unfavorable as interaction distance decreased and attitudes toward a conforming member became more favorable as interaction distance decreased.…”
Section: The Demand For Conformitymentioning
confidence: 75%
“…Willis (1964c) reported that both independents and anticonformers tended to be disliked. Other support for the general proposition that deviates received less approval or more disapproval has been reported by Hollander (1961), Streufert (1965), Emerson (1954), Byrne (1961), andStrickland, Jones, andSmith (1960).…”
Section: The Demand For Conformitymentioning
confidence: 91%
“…on six semantic differential scales that were presented. Among such were two evaluative scales which had been found to correlate most highly with the good-bad scale and Intel-correlate most highly with each other in previous research by Streufert (1965Streufert ( , 1966. The scales used were "bright-dark" and "awful-nice."…”
Section: Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%