2011
DOI: 10.1080/10570314.2010.536965
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Communicative Tensions of Community Organizing: The Case of a Local Neighborhood Association

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“… 1. For exceptions in recent scholarship, see Dempsey, 2009; Dempsey & Sanders, 2010; Eisenberg & Eschenfelder, 2009; Ganesh & McAllum, 2009; Garner & Garner, 2011; Koschmann & Laster, 2011; Lewis, 2005; and Lewis, Isbell, & Koschmann, 2010. …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 1. For exceptions in recent scholarship, see Dempsey, 2009; Dempsey & Sanders, 2010; Eisenberg & Eschenfelder, 2009; Ganesh & McAllum, 2009; Garner & Garner, 2011; Koschmann & Laster, 2011; Lewis, 2005; and Lewis, Isbell, & Koschmann, 2010. …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tracy’s empirical work on how prison guards framed the inherent tensions of their work (e.g., as tension, paradox, or double-bind) illustrated how such communication practices significantly influenced individual well-being and organizational outcomes. Similarly, Koschmann and Laster (2011) illustrated how communication practices enabled members of a neighborhood association to productively engage the tensions and disagreements regarding religious expression, diversity, and neighborhood quality. As these studies illustrate, tension and contradiction in and of themselves are not inherently negative in their consequences.…”
Section: Contradiction-centered Perspectives Of Organizingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, identity surfaces as an important construct as stakeholders manage the tensions present at relationship and structural levels of collaboration (Lewis et al, 2010) especially in their roles as organizational boundary spanners (Isbell, 2012). Other research has examined what contributes to participation at the group level (Koschmann & Laster, 2011) and has developed antecedents to collaboration. For example, Cooper and Shumate (2012) examined the differences between donor instigated collaboration (mandated) and grassroots collaboration (voluntary) on attitudes and group outcomes of collaboration.…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%