2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0093-934x(03)00062-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Communicative deficits in agenesis of the corpus callosum: Nonliteral language and affective prosody

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
102
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 145 publications
(112 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
9
102
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As of yet, the pattern of consistent cognitive deficits in ACC has not been fully described. However, our results thus far, and those appearing in the research literature, suggest that high-functioning adults with ACC typically have moderate but detectable deficits in the following areas: interhemispheric transfer of complex sensory information and learning [15][16][17][18][19][20]; bimanual motor coordination [18,21,22]; complex novel problem-solving [13,14,[23][24][25][26]; processing of subtle phonetic and semantic aspects of language [13,[27][28][29][30][31][32]; comprehension of second-order meanings of language [33][34][35]; and psychosocial understanding and behavior [14,35]. Since the individuals with ACC that we have studied have complete ACC, normal IQs, and few, if any, other structural brain abnormalities, we refer to this form of ACC as Primary ACC.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As of yet, the pattern of consistent cognitive deficits in ACC has not been fully described. However, our results thus far, and those appearing in the research literature, suggest that high-functioning adults with ACC typically have moderate but detectable deficits in the following areas: interhemispheric transfer of complex sensory information and learning [15][16][17][18][19][20]; bimanual motor coordination [18,21,22]; complex novel problem-solving [13,14,[23][24][25][26]; processing of subtle phonetic and semantic aspects of language [13,[27][28][29][30][31][32]; comprehension of second-order meanings of language [33][34][35]; and psychosocial understanding and behavior [14,35]. Since the individuals with ACC that we have studied have complete ACC, normal IQs, and few, if any, other structural brain abnormalities, we refer to this form of ACC as Primary ACC.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…A number of studies have demonstrated that individuals with ACC have difficulty on tasks involving complex novel problem solving [13,14,[23][24][25][26][67][68][69]. In addition, individuals with ACC have deficits in comprehension of the second-order meanings of language [33][34][35].…”
Section: Cbcl Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, executive functions, reading and spelling skills were relatively preserved. Studies examining social functioning in individuals with AgCC report a range of impairments, such as reduced understanding of jokes and humor (Brown, Paul, Symington, & Dietrich, 2005), proverb and non-literal items (Paul, Van Lancker-Sidtis, Schieffer, Dietrich, & Brown, 2003), complex social scenes (Brown & Paul, 2000;Paul, Schieffer, & Brown, 2004;Turk, Brown, Symington, & Paul, 2010), integration of social information from multiple sources (e.g., paralinguistic cues, nonliteral language; Symington, Paul, Symington, Ono, & Brown, 2010), story-generation skills (Paul et al, 2004), and difficulties experiencing and thinking about complex but not basic emotions in the context of social interactions (L. B. Anderson, Paul, & Brown, 2017).…”
Section: [Insert Figure 1 Here]mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Bridgman, Brown, Spezio, Leonard, Adolphs, and Paul (2014) found that AgCC patients performed poorly when asked to name the emotion displayed in a series of faces. Similarly, AgCC patients perform worse than control subjects in understanding emotional-prosodic cues (Paul, Van Lancker-Sidtis, Schieffer, Dietrich & Brown, 2003), in understanding and discussing socially complex scenes (Paul, Schieffer & Brown, 2004), and understanding humour (Brown, Paul, Symington & Dietrich, 2005) --despite having equivalent IQs to control participants.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%