2008
DOI: 10.1080/10410230701808376
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Communication with Breast Cancer Survivors

Abstract: Breast cancer survivors must manage chronic side effects of original treatment. To manage these symptoms, communication must include both biomedical and contextual lifestyle factors. Sixty breast cancer survivors and 6 providers were recruited to test a conceptual model developed from uncertainty in illness theory and the dimensions of a patient-centered relationship. Visits were audio-taped, then coded using the Measure of Patient-Centered Communication (Brown, Stewart, & Ryan, 2001). Consultations were found… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
32
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
2
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, physicians’ ability to communicate helpful advice and complete information was key to patients’ comfort regarding prognosis and treatment. For cancer patients, unresolved physical problems often prompt emotional uncertainty about prognosis, [19;32;33]. Our findings support prior survivor-physician research [34;35] showing that survivors perceived optimal quality of care when they experienced satisfactory patient-centered communication with physicians.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…Thus, physicians’ ability to communicate helpful advice and complete information was key to patients’ comfort regarding prognosis and treatment. For cancer patients, unresolved physical problems often prompt emotional uncertainty about prognosis, [19;32;33]. Our findings support prior survivor-physician research [34;35] showing that survivors perceived optimal quality of care when they experienced satisfactory patient-centered communication with physicians.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…Scores on the MFSI-SF have evidence of being reliable and valid (Donovan et al, 2015; Stein et al, 2004). Reported reliabilities for scores on the total scale have ranged from .86 to .96 (Clayton, Dudley, & Musters, 2008; Roepke et al, 2009; Stein et al, 1998). Construct validity has been supported with confirmatory factor analysis of the five subscales (Stein et al, 2004); concurrent validity has been supported with significant correlations between the MFSI-SF and Profile of Mood States (POMS) fatigue scale scores in both African Americans and Caucasians (Bardwell et al, 2006) and with scores on the Fatigue Symptom Inventory (Stein et al, 2004).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further, the use of audio recorded data has been shown to be feasible and comprehensive, with other researchers using audio-recordings to investigate patient-provider communication processes (e.g. Brown, Butow, Boyle, & Tattersall, 2007; Clayton, Dudley, & Musters, 2008; Hausmann et al, 2011; Pollak et al, 2007). Despite the limitations associated with recording audio only, this study is the first of its kind and magnitude, and our systematic large scale examination of audio recorded communication during the provision of home hospice care has the potential to make significant contributions to the end-of-life literature and care, as well as to the development of approaches to ensure the rigor required when managing large longitudinal datasets.…”
Section: Challenge: Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%