Communication strategies for earning trust in climate change debates

Abstract

Climate scientists need the trust of lay audiences if they are to share their knowledge. But significant audience segments—those doubtful or dismissive of climate change—distrust climate scientists. In response, climate scientists can undertake one of two general communication strategies for enhancing trust, each appealing to one of two broad types of cognitive processing mechanisms. In the first, the communicator displays traits like humor, attractiveness, vigorous delivery, and likeability that audiences use as heuristics in determining whom to trust. But this strategy is unlikely to be successful with the very audiences who are its main targets, since those audiences will be primed to employ a more analytic and critical approach to assessing trustworthiness. In the second communicative strategy, the communicator earns trust by undertaking burdens and commitments and making herself vulnerable in ways her audience can enforce. This vulnerability signals her trustworthiness, since the audience can reason that she would not undertake such risks unless she was confident in what she was saying. Climate scientists have a variety of ways of making themselves vulnerable, including committing themselves to engaging with doubtful and dismissive audiences, undertaking burdens of proof to argue with them, empowering audiences to assess the science themselves, admitting error, and focusing on small issues. Overall, when adopting the second strategy, climate scientists must extend trust in order to earn trust, committing themselves to an on‐going relationship within which their true trustworthiness will become apparent. WIREs Clim Change 2014, 5:151–160. doi: 10.1002/wcc.262 This article is categorized under: Perceptions, Behavior, and Communication of Climate Change > Communication Social Status of Climate Change Knowledge > Knowledge and Practice

The relative importance of subjective and structural factors for individual adaptation to climate change by forest owners in Sweden

“…Results of this study confirm earlier research that has shown that personal trust in climate science is a key lever for climate awareness and action (Malka et al 2009;Kahan et al 2012). This highlights the importance of communication interventions to improve public trust in climate science (Goodwin and Dahlstrom 2014) to enhance awareness and knowledge about climate change impacts and adaptation options (Moser 2014).…”

Using narratives and storytelling to communicate science with nonexpert audiences

“…Trust is receiving growing attention as one of the central issues in science communication. Even though overall trust in science remains strong (5), many are pointing to a crisis in trust between the public and specific areas of science as an obstacle to successful science communication (73,74). For example, survey data suggest that trust in institutional actors matters more for the acceptance of technologies than individual knowledge or education levels (75,76).…”

“…Similarly, the link between knowledge and concern about climate change was found to depend upon levels of trust in scientists (77). Although persuasion theories suggest peripheral source cues that lend themselves to trustworthiness (78), developing trust in the midst of more controversial science communication contexts demands different tactics, but still remains challenging (74).…”

Beyond long-term averages: making biological sense of a rapidly changing world

“…Goodwin and Dahlstrom [100] explored the levels of trust between climate scientists and their lay audiences, and suggested that trust was established, at least in part, when communicators make themselves vulnerable to their audiences by offering predictions that may in the end be proven wrong and by accepting the consequences of these incorrect predictions. On this premise, weather forecasters are highly trusted, not because they are flawless in their predictions, but because they make predictions on a daily basis that are then tested empirically by their lay audience.…”