2022
DOI: 10.1080/19312458.2022.2099819
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Communication Quality Analysis: A User-friendly Observational Measure of Patient–Clinician Communication

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The third part of this project helped establish that CQA can be feasibly and reliably applied to ICU family meetings, as evidenced by the high interrater reliability for each communication quality domain. Previous work shows that CQA is feasible, reliable, and valid in other settings when distinguishing between high-quality and low-quality conversations based on communication goals, 11,12,16,20 but this was the first study to use CQA in a clinical context. The present CQA data provide a descriptive account of how specific communication goals are achieved by family members and clinicians.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The third part of this project helped establish that CQA can be feasibly and reliably applied to ICU family meetings, as evidenced by the high interrater reliability for each communication quality domain. Previous work shows that CQA is feasible, reliable, and valid in other settings when distinguishing between high-quality and low-quality conversations based on communication goals, 11,12,16,20 but this was the first study to use CQA in a clinical context. The present CQA data provide a descriptive account of how specific communication goals are achieved by family members and clinicians.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…CQA, which has been validated across multiple contexts. 11,16,20 involves having 3 coders independently review audio recordings and verbatim transcripts. For each 5-minute interval of the recorded conversation, coders rate how well each participant attended to task, relational, and identity goals on 7-point Likert scales (1 = lowest qu ality and 7 = highest quality ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations