2002
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2788.2002.00355.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Communication profiles of individuals with Down's syndrome, Angelman syndrome and pervasive developmental disorder

Abstract: The communication profiles of individuals with Down's syndrome (DS), Angelman syndrome (AS) and pervasive developmental disorder (PDD) were investigated and contrasted. Seventy-seven individuals participated in the study. A within-group analysis revealed that those with DS performed better on tacting or labelling and echoing than on manding or requesting. No other effects were found, apart from an absence of echoing in those with AS, a result that is hardly surprising. A between-groups analysis revealed no dif… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
22
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
4
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A developmental age for each subtest in each domain (i.e., receptive, expressive, and written communication skills; personal, domestic, and community daily living skills; interpersonal relationships, play and leisure time, and coping socialization skills; and gross and fine motor skills) is calculated based on the raw scores. The VABS-II has been validated in children and adults with intellectual disabilities and a prior edition has been used in studies with AS patients 7,30,31…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A developmental age for each subtest in each domain (i.e., receptive, expressive, and written communication skills; personal, domestic, and community daily living skills; interpersonal relationships, play and leisure time, and coping socialization skills; and gross and fine motor skills) is calculated based on the raw scores. The VABS-II has been validated in children and adults with intellectual disabilities and a prior edition has been used in studies with AS patients 7,30,31…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Decisions that need to be made include the mode(s) of communication that the child will be taught to use and the initial communicative functions/skills to target for acquisition. Duker, van Driel, and van de Bercken (2002) developed a useful tool for gaining stakeholder perspectives in these two critical areas. The unique aspect of this instrument is that it provides opportunities for stakeholders to consider the full range of speech and nonspeech communication modes (speech, gestures, manual sign, picture communication) and a range of communicative functions based on Skinner's (1957) functional classification of verbal behavior (i.e., mands, tacts, echoics).…”
Section: Stakeholder Perspectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One formal study evaluating the adaptive behavior profiles of children and adults with AS (age range ¼ 3-52) found that mean adaptive behavior composite scores fell at a 16-month level [Duker et al, 2002]. Relative adaptive strengths and weaknesses were not reported.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%