Communication patterns in a psychotherapy following traumatic brain injury: A quantitative case study based on symbolic dynamics

Abstract

BackgroundThe role of psychotherapy in the treatment of traumatic brain injury is receiving increased attention. The evaluation of psychotherapy with these patients has been conducted largely in the absence of quantitative data concerning the therapy itself. Quantitative methods for characterizing the sequence-sensitive structure of patient-therapist communication are now being developed with the objective of improving the effectiveness of psychotherapy following traumatic brain injury.MethodsThe content of three therapy session transcripts (sessions were separated by four months) obtained from a patient with a history of several motor vehicle accidents who was receiving dialectical behavior therapy was scored and analyzed using methods derived from the mathematical theory of symbolic dynamics.ResultsThe analysis of symbol frequencies was largely uninformative. When repeated triples were examined a marked pattern of change in content was observed over the three sessions. The context free grammar complexity and the Lempel-Ziv complexity were calculated for each therapy session. For both measures, the rate of complexity generation, expressed as bits per minute, increased longitudinally during the course of therapy. The between-session increases in complexity generation rates are consistent with calculations of mutual information. Taken together these results indicate that there was a quantifiable increase in the variability of patient-therapist verbal behavior during the course of therapy. Comparison of complexity values against values obtained from equiprobable random surrogates established the presence of a nonrandom structure in patient-therapist dialog (P = .002).ConclusionsWhile recognizing that only limited conclusions can be based on a case history, it can be noted that these quantitative observations are consistent with qualitative clinical observations of increases in the flexibility of discourse during therapy. These procedures can be of particular value in the examination of therapies following traumatic brain injury because, in some presentations, these therapies are complicated by deficits that result in subtle distortions of language that produce significant post-injury social impairment. Independently of the mathematical analysis applied to the investigation of therapy-generated symbol sequences, our experience suggests that the procedures presented here are of value in training therapists.

Is a diagnosis of “mild traumatic brain injury” a category mistake?

“…The power of this form of analysis should not be underestimated as, for example, in the research of Wylie et al 116,117 on interference control during action selection in Parkinson's disease and in recent quantitative studies of patterns in patient-therapist communication in psychotherapy after TBI. 118 The search for mechanisms and processes, physiological or psychological, is demanding. As previously observed, different injury events can initiate different pathophysiological processes, and a single injury event can initiate more than one pathophysiological process.…”

Behavioral Deficits and Axonal Injury Persistence after Rotational Head Injury Are Direction Dependent

“…20 Because the Lempel-Ziv Complexity is influenced by the length of the zone sequence and its degree of disorder, we normalized it using 499 random surrogates to capture disorder that is independent of the number of observations. 21 The normalized complexity varies from * 0 to 1. At the extreme, 0 is obtained when the message consists of a single repeated symbol, and 1 is obtained when the sequence is truly random.…”