2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.scoms.2013.04.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Communication of political interest groups in Switzerland: Adressees, channels and instruments

Abstract: We present a broad overview on the Swiss interest group population and the results of a quantitative online survey on the communication repertoire of 985 interest groups. We then discuss sample construction and the different addressees of interest group communication, the perceived relevance of mass media channels, and which instruments and measures are used to communicate with external and internal environments. We identify four different logics -influence, support, reputation and reciprocity -that influence … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
10
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on the data collected by Jentges et al. (), we expect a similar diversification of the interest groups’ population in Switzerland. Second, the literature on population ecology (see Lowery et al.…”
Section: Theoretical Expectations About Mps: Groups Tiesmentioning
confidence: 71%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Based on the data collected by Jentges et al. (), we expect a similar diversification of the interest groups’ population in Switzerland. Second, the literature on population ecology (see Lowery et al.…”
Section: Theoretical Expectations About Mps: Groups Tiesmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…At the same time, the research of Jentges et al. (: 36) on Switzerland suggests a continuous growth of interest groups’ population. As the stock of groups increases, they may be more likely to be represented among MPs’ ties.…”
Section: Theoretical Expectations About Mps: Groups Tiesmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Interest group strategies have been extensively studied by academics over the last decade (e.g., Alexander & Nownes, 2008;Betzold, 2014;Constantelos, 2007;Dür & Mateo, 2013;Gullberg, 2008;Hamilton, Hyman, Torres, & Zúñiga, 2013;Klüver, Mahoney, & Opper, 2015;Lees-Marshment, 2003;Mahoney, 2007;Panagopoulos, 2006;Woll, 2012;Yadav, 2008;Junk, 2016). However, only recently have a few studies focused on the use of social media in interest groups' advocacy toolkits (see Obar, Zube, & Lampe, 2012;Jentges, Brändli, Donges, & Jarren, 2013;Brown, 2016;Chalmers & Shotton, 2016;van der Graaf, Otjes, & Rasmussen, 2016).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Germany, as mentioned earlier, Klüver (2012) Jentges et al (2012Jentges et al ( , 2013 take a similar approach (but they include the OECKL directory as well). Currently, several research projects for which population ecological data is a small or substantial part, most notably this is the Intereuro project (www.intereuro.eu), Interarena project (www.interarena.dk) and recent initiatives by Beyers (Beyers 2014a, Beyers 2014b) that build upon his, and co-authors, Belgian research (Fraussen, Beyers & Donas 2014).…”
Section: Counting Organizations Per Typementioning
confidence: 99%