2011
DOI: 10.1063/1.3615541
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Communication: Momentum-resolved quantum interference in optically excited surface states

Abstract: Surface states play essential roles in condensed matter physics, e.g., as model two-dimensional (2D) electron gases and as the basis for topological insulators. Here, we demonstrate quantum interference in the optical excitation of 2D surface states using the model system of C60/Au(111). These surface states are transiently populated and probed in a femtosecond time- and angle-resolved two-photon photoemission experiment. We observe quantum interference within the excited populations of these surface states as… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
22
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
(27 reference statements)
6
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the Si(100) surface the two-photon photoemission (2PPE) intensity exhibits complex interference phenomena as a function of the excitation energy, which can be explained by a two-state double-continuum extension of Fano's theory. Our observations and modeling are general and clarify unexplained intensity variations in optical absorption, for example, at surfaces [14], in nanostructures [15], and organic thin films on inorganic substrates [16].…”
supporting
confidence: 60%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For the Si(100) surface the two-photon photoemission (2PPE) intensity exhibits complex interference phenomena as a function of the excitation energy, which can be explained by a two-state double-continuum extension of Fano's theory. Our observations and modeling are general and clarify unexplained intensity variations in optical absorption, for example, at surfaces [14], in nanostructures [15], and organic thin films on inorganic substrates [16].…”
supporting
confidence: 60%
“…For the Si(100) surface the two-photon photoemission (2PPE) intensity exhibits complex interference phenomena as a function of the excitation energy, which can be explained by a two-state double-continuum extension of Fano's theory. Our observations and modeling are general and clarify unexplained intensity variations in optical absorption, for example, at surfaces [14], in nanostructures [15], and organic thin films on inorganic substrates [16].As the Si(100) surface is the most important template for semiconductor device fabrication, a detailed description of its electronic structure has been developed [17][18][19][20]. The formation of surface dimers results in a (2 Â 1) reconstruction at room temperature and a semiconducting surface with occupied and empty dangling-bond bands D up and D down .…”
supporting
confidence: 56%
“…Inspecting once more the optical resonance in the n = 2 IPR manifold in Figure 11, we find that as a function of excitation energy the intensities of the Shockley state and the n = 2 IPR experience 'intensity switching' upon crossing the resonance: below resonance the IPR generally dominates, while above resonance the Shockley surface state carries most of the excitation cross-section. This is reminiscent of the asymmetric intensity distributions for the image potential states on Si(100) and for C 60 /Au(111) in k-space, where the observation of quantum interference was reported [26][27][28].…”
Section: Ipr Excitation Profilementioning
confidence: 89%
“…Fano resonances on surfaces have indeed been observed recently on Si(100) and in momentum-space maps of C 60 on Au(111) [27,28]. The IPR on Au(111) provides thus a model system to measure directly factors controlling the coupling of a confined quasi-2D quantum system to a continuum, the fingerprints of which are expected to appear in the TPPE excitation spectra.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…6) might be based on the assumption of a strongly anisotropic dephasing time, caused by elastic scattering from the step edges, that changes the population dynamics within individual momentum windows and additionally modulates the total 2PPE yield as a function of k y [50,53]. A finite dephasing time T * 2 influences both the maximum population of the intermediate state as well as the time of maximum population.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%