2014
DOI: 10.1063/1.4897324
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Communication: Modeling charge-sign asymmetric solvation free energies with nonlinear boundary conditions

Abstract: We show that charge-sign-dependent asymmetric hydration can be modeled accurately using linear Poisson theory after replacing the standard electric-displacement boundary condition with a simple nonlinear boundary condition. Using a single multiplicative scaling factor to determine atomic radii from molecular dynamics Lennard-Jones parameters, the new model accurately reproduces MD free-energy calculations of hydration asymmetries for: (i) monatomic ions, (ii) titratable amino acids in both their protonated and… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

4
99
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(103 citation statements)
references
References 76 publications
(99 reference statements)
4
99
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This could indicate that charge-sign hydration asymmetry is more significant in protic solvents, and furthermore it may be dependent on R s . We recently developed a semi-empirical nonlinear SLIC that captures charge-sign asymmetry [42,43]. Similar to our work here, that SLIC replaced a normal-field-dependent 'radius perturbation' with a perturbation in the boundary condition.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…This could indicate that charge-sign hydration asymmetry is more significant in protic solvents, and furthermore it may be dependent on R s . We recently developed a semi-empirical nonlinear SLIC that captures charge-sign asymmetry [42,43]. Similar to our work here, that SLIC replaced a normal-field-dependent 'radius perturbation' with a perturbation in the boundary condition.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…A hierarchy of approximations, many of which are essentially unavoidable, separates the PB (and the GB) from the more fundamental explicit solvent representation, and from reality . These approximations result in notable limitations of the pure GB or PB frameworks, such as their inability to account for many prominent explicit solvent effects, including charge hydration asymmetry and other water multipole effects, water ‘bridges,’ electrostriction and dielectric saturation . Also, accurate estimates of total solvation energies, and especially their differences in conformational transitions, need accurate nonpolar estimates of the nonpolar contribution .…”
Section: Implicit Solvent Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One remedy then is to reparameterize all the solute–water LJ parameters. Another is to consider solute–solvent interfacial conditions for the Poisson or PB treatment . A second theoretical issue is the estimate of entropy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another is to consider solute-solvent interfacial conditions for the Poisson or PB treatment. [83] A second theoretical issue is the estimate of entropy. This is completely missing in our current theory.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%