2016
DOI: 10.1109/tac.2016.2527731
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Communication-Free Multi-Agent Control Under Local Temporal Tasks and Relative-Distance Constraints

Abstract: We propose a distributed control and coordination strategy for multi-agent systems where each agent has a local task specified as a Linear Temporal Logic (LTL) formula and at the same time is subject to relative-distance constraints with its neighboring agents. The local tasks capture the temporal requirements on individual agents' behaviors, while the relativedistance constraints impose requirements on the collective motion of the whole team. The proposed solution relies only on relativestate measurements amo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
36
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The main difficulty lies in the limited communication range for both source and relay robots, meaning that both data transfer and coordination are only possible when two robots are within each other's communication range. As discussed in Section I, instead of imposing all-time connectivity as in most related work [14], [16], [21]- [23], we propose here a distributed online coordination scheme where the communication network is allowed to become disconnected.…”
Section: B Coordination Of Intermittent Meeting-eventsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The main difficulty lies in the limited communication range for both source and relay robots, meaning that both data transfer and coordination are only possible when two robots are within each other's communication range. As discussed in Section I, instead of imposing all-time connectivity as in most related work [14], [16], [21]- [23], we propose here a distributed online coordination scheme where the communication network is allowed to become disconnected.…”
Section: B Coordination Of Intermittent Meeting-eventsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In most of these problems, the property of interest is connectivity of the communication network as this allows reliable delivery of information between any pair of robots. Approaches that ensure connectivity for all time either maintain all initial communication links between the robots provided that the initial communication network is connected [14], [19]- [21], or allow for addition and removal of communication links while ensuring that the connectivity requirement is not violated [15]- [18], [22], [23]. Realistic communication models have recently been proposed in [24]- [26] that take into account path loss, shadowing, and multipath fading.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2) Cost: Motivated by [17], the cost of the path P(π) is defined as the (estimated) distance travelled by the group of agents.…”
Section: Reward and Cost Of A Pathmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The proposed multi-robot scheme is based on a prioritized leader-follower coordination. Prioritization in multi-agent systems for navigation-type objectives has been employed in Guo, Tumova, and Dimarogonas (2016) and Roussos and Kyriakopoulos (2013), where KRNF gain tuning-type methodologies are developed. The proposed framework, however, is substantially different from these works; Guo et al (2016) do not take into account inter-agent collisions, and use prioritization for the sequential navigation and task satisfaction subject to connectivity constraints, while Roussos and Kyriakopoulos (2013) use prioritization for directional collision-avoidance.…”
Section: Extension To Multi-robot Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is accomplished by differentiating the free spaces of the leader and the followers. Moreover, the aforementioned works Guo et al (2016) and Roussos and Kyriakopoulos (2013) consider simplified first-order dynamics and cannot be easily extended to the uncertain dynamics-case considered here. In fact, we note that, according to our best knowledge, there does not exist a control framework that provably guarantees decentralized safe multi-robot navigation in workspaces with obstacles and subject to uncertain 2nd-order dynamics.…”
Section: Extension To Multi-robot Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%