2010
DOI: 10.1080/14708470903348523
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Communication, discourses and interculturality

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
(18 reference statements)
0
10
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In spite of considerable criticism over a sustained period (e.g. Bond, Žegarac, and Spencer-Oatey 2000;Holliday 2010Holliday , 2011Kim 2005;McSweeney 2002;Young and Sercombe 2010), much cross-cultural education, particularly that related to the training of business personnel, is still dependent for its main conceptual frame of reference on a priori cultural categorisation tending to equate nationality and culture, of the type developed and promulgated by Hofstede and colleagues, with which to describe and predict cultural behaviour. Alternative approaches, which explicitly resist or at least interrogate such reductive categorisations, are beginning to influence the field (e.g.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In spite of considerable criticism over a sustained period (e.g. Bond, Žegarac, and Spencer-Oatey 2000;Holliday 2010Holliday , 2011Kim 2005;McSweeney 2002;Young and Sercombe 2010), much cross-cultural education, particularly that related to the training of business personnel, is still dependent for its main conceptual frame of reference on a priori cultural categorisation tending to equate nationality and culture, of the type developed and promulgated by Hofstede and colleagues, with which to describe and predict cultural behaviour. Alternative approaches, which explicitly resist or at least interrogate such reductive categorisations, are beginning to influence the field (e.g.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Littrell et al 2006). While as a discreet discipline area the study of cross-or intercultural communication in higher education is still in its relative infancy, its study for either a (predominantly postgraduate) degree subject in itself or as part of other degrees in the humanities and social sciences is a growing international phenomenon, especially in North America and Europe (Young and Sercombe 2010). There are suggestions in the literature related to the 'internationalisation' of higher education that cross-or intercultural communication competence should be an aim for staff and students whether or not they are 'international' (Sanderson 2008;Stier 2006).…”
Section: International Students and Cross-cultural Communication Educmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The subject of the present article is an under‐researched phenomenon of interculturality as a source of organisational positivity in expatriate work teams. To date, interculturality has primarily been examined in the research on identity, international education, and language and communication (Dervin, ; Dervin & Risager, ; Harsch & Poehner, ; Jackson, ; Svetelj, ; Young & Sercombe, ; Woodin ). The key facets of interculturality are cultural fluency, flexibility, and adaptability; self‐monitoring and self‐regulation; and reflection on one’s own cognition, emotion, and behaviour.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Inter-culture is considered as a dynamic process by which people not only draw on, but also use the resources and processes of cultures. Moreover, they may become familiar with those they may not be associated with in their interactions with others (Young & Sercombe, 2010). An inter-cultural approach is absolutely central to influential curricular frameworks for language.…”
Section: Current Research Into Clt In Efl Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%