2011
DOI: 10.1063/1.3598339
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Communication: Determination of the bond dissociation energy (D) of the water dimer, (H2O)2, by velocity map imaging

Abstract: The bond dissociation energy (D(0)) of the water dimer is determined by using state-to-state vibrational predissociation measurements following excitation of the bound OH stretch fundamental of the donor unit of the dimer. Velocity map imaging and resonance-enhanced multiphoton ionization (REMPI) are used to determine pair-correlated product velocity and translational energy distributions. H(2)O fragments are detected in the ground vibrational (000) and the first excited bending (010) states by 2 + 1 REMPI via… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

32
154
3
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 216 publications
(194 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
(103 reference statements)
32
154
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As a final test, we compare the dissociation energy D 0 = 1108.2 cm −1 obtained from the CCpol-8sf potential with the experimental value 1105 ± 10 cm −1 recently measured by Rocher-Casterline and co-workers 55 by velocity map imaging. The calculated value is off by only 3 cm −1 , well within the experimental error bars, which tends to validate both this new potential and the method used to perform the VRT level calculations.…”
Section: Flexible-monomer Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a final test, we compare the dissociation energy D 0 = 1108.2 cm −1 obtained from the CCpol-8sf potential with the experimental value 1105 ± 10 cm −1 recently measured by Rocher-Casterline and co-workers 55 by velocity map imaging. The calculated value is off by only 3 cm −1 , well within the experimental error bars, which tends to validate both this new potential and the method used to perform the VRT level calculations.…”
Section: Flexible-monomer Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such accuracies have so far only been reported for small H-bonded complexes, such as the dimers and trimers of HF, H 2 O, and HCl. [30][31][32]58 Both correlated wave function and dispersion-corrected density functional calculations predict the face and edge isomers. There are two calculated face structures, B and B ′ , with a low barrier between them; we observe only one face isomer.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…29 Below, we show that both isomers are formed; we can determine the D 0 (S 0 ) values of both isomers separately within ±3 cm −1 and ±10 cm −1 , making these measurements among the most accurate experimental intermolecular dissociation energies to date. 9,[30][31][32] These measurements on isomers of the same complex represent useful benchmarks and a special challenge for theory. The accuracy of calculated dissociation energies of large intermolecular complexes depend on whether the structure is π-stacked or H-bonded.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[4][5][6] In particular, bimolecular clusters encompass a variety of noncovalent bonding prototypes, ranging from pure van der Waals interactions 7 in Ar-Ar (D 0 ≈ 84 cm −1 ) to the significantly stronger hydrogen bonding in water dimer (D 0 ≈ 1105(10) cm −1 ). [8][9][10] A striking feature of these weakly bound van der Waals systems is the propensity for each component to retain a significant fraction of monomeric character, for example, as noted in the small shifts of infrared transition frequencies upon complexation. 11 Furthermore, weak potential coupling can lead to nearly free internal rotation of the dimer subunits; in Ar-H 2 O, for example, the internal rotational spacings are shifted by only a few wavenumbers 12 from those of free H 2 O.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%