2002
DOI: 10.1006/inco.2001.3069
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Communication Complexity Method for Measuring Nondeterminism in Finite Automata

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
58
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
58
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Polynomially ambiguous (unweighted) automata have been studied by various authors, e.g., [14,15,25]. The following characterization is shown implicitly in [14,15] (cf.…”
Section: Weighted Finite Automatamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Polynomially ambiguous (unweighted) automata have been studied by various authors, e.g., [14,15,25]. The following characterization is shown implicitly in [14,15] (cf.…”
Section: Weighted Finite Automatamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The following characterization is shown implicitly in [14,15] (cf. Proof of Theorem 3.1 in [15] or Lemma 4.3 in [14]).…”
Section: Weighted Finite Automatamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The celebrated separation result of Leung [30] establishes that there exist (exponentially ambiguous) n-state NFAs such that any equivalent polynomially ambiguous NFA needs 2 n − 1 states. Hromkovič et al [19,20] have used powerful techniques from communications complexity for state complexity separations for NFAs with different degree of ambiguity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%