Communication behaviors and patient autonomy in hospital care: A qualitative study

Abstract

A B S T R A C TBackground: Little is known about how hospitalized patients share decisions with physicians. Methods: We conducted an observational study of patient-doctor communication on an inpatient medicine service among 18 hospitalized patients and 9 physicians. A research assistant (RA) approached newly hospitalized patients and their physicians before morning rounds and obtained consent. The RA audio recorded morning rounds, and then separately interviewed both patient and physician. Coding was done using integrated analysis. Results: Most patients were white (61%) and half were female. Most physicians were male (66%) and of Southeast Asian descent (66%). All physicians explained the plan of care to the patients; most believed that their patient understood. However, many patients did not. Physicians rarely asked the patient for their opinion. In all those cases, the decision had been made previously by the doctors. No decisions were made with the patient. Patients sometimes disagreed. Conclusions: Shared decision-making may not be the norm in hospital care. Although physicians do explain treatment plans, many hospitalized patients do not understand enough to share in decisions. When patients do assert their opinion, it can result in conflict. Practice implications: Some hospitalized patients are interested in discussing treatment. Improving hospital communication can foster patient autonomy.

Introducing physician associates to hospital patients: Development and feasibility testing of a patient experience‐based intervention

“…The anticipated benefits of accessing information from the PA about their personal care and treatment were attractive to several participants. These responses are congruent with findings from the literature indicating that patients receive insufficient personal information from their doctors during hospital ward rounds 46 . The psychological benefits of patient information in the hospital context are also recognized in terms of helping patients know what to expect, thereby reducing uncertainty and anxiety 20,21 …”

Understanding patients’ satisfaction with physician assistant/associate encounters through communication experiences: a qualitative study in acute hospitals in England

“…Patient-centred information provision is recognised as complex because needs and preferences frequently vary dependent on personal characteristics and context [50]. Acute hospital encounters pose a particular challenge given the limited time generally available for processing information [51]. Yet despite most participants in this study experiencing a single hospital encounter, they reported PAs having successfully linked information provision about care management to participant need.…”

“…Shared decision making is also arguably more effective as a collaborative process over time than a one-off decision [52]. Additionally, patient preferences for involvement in decision-making can differ widely especially in the hospital setting [51, 53], which is likely to influence how clinicians interpret these preferences. In this study, most participants expressed appreciation with the PA for enabling a better understanding of their health condition and treatment, even without evidence of shared decision-making.…”

Decision‐making for older patients undergoing emergency laparotomy: defining patient and clinician values and priorities

“…General Medical Council and Department of Health consent guidelines suggest that clinicians respect the specific views, beliefs and preferences of the patient and make no assumptions about which outcomes are most important to them [10,11]. ‘Adequately’ informed consent is difficult to measure, due to clinicians over‐estimating patient understanding and under‐estimating difficulties with information recall [12]. Patients and clinicians often struggle to agree on the concept of risk.…”