Communication as the purpose of existence of modern organizations

Тараненко, А.И.; Panasenko, G. V.

doi:10.17516/1997-1370-0022

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The reasons lie not in the lack of scientific concepts or training programs, activities aimed at improving legal literacy, certainly contributing to the development of conciliation procedures, but in the mechanism of their implementation by law enforcers. This requires a formal attitude and a live dialogue of the official [16], especially when working with minors, which reveals the very conceptual idea and the means of implementation. Therefore, it is necessary to include the conditions for encouraging the parties to use conciliation procedures in the legal regulations.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Implementation of conciliation procedures in socio-cultural and legal dimensions

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The study’s objective is to develop theoretical provisions revealing the conceptual features of forming and implementing conciliation procedures. The authors pay special attention to the most controversial issues that prevent their dissemination in the Russian Federation. The methodological basis of the study consisted of dialectical analysis, which allowed to evaluate the results of rule-making and law enforcement; the comparative-legal method contributed to an objective assessment of the quality of existing legislation; the systematic method allowed to interpret the categorical apparatus on the example of studying “conciliation procedures”; the method of legal modeling allowed to formulate a model of conciliation procedures, which has a separate, independent place in the legislation of several countries. The result of the work was to draw attention to the meaning of “conciliation procedures” in its empirical and functional aspect and to prove that conciliation procedures, with their objective and subjective justification, are a fundamental category of modern objective law, in which the freedom of choice of subjects of law is not limited to permissive and administrative means, but must be justified by the essence of the dispute being resolved and the final result. The study’s novelty is the conclusion that in some cases, the reference to legislation providing for “conciliation procedures” for legal entities is not always consistent and does not reflect its ontological nature. For, conciliation procedures, expressing an example of the permissive rule of Russian legislation with the peculiarities of its legal regulation of certain legal institutions, should be aimed at developing voluntary settlement by the parties to a legal dispute as a special type of social conflict.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%