1992
DOI: 10.1007/bf02217624
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Communication and sustainable agriculture: Building agendas for research and practice

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Research has shown, for example, that farm periodicals tend to serve as an advocacy press in covering issues related to animal rights (Reisner, 1992). Other analyses have revealed evidence or raised questions about various kinds of advertiser influence on editorial content of farm periodicals (e.g., Sweeney & Hollifield, 2000;Walter, 1992;Reisner & Walter, 1994;Hays, 1992).…”
Section: Types and Effects Of Advertising-based Pressurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research has shown, for example, that farm periodicals tend to serve as an advocacy press in covering issues related to animal rights (Reisner, 1992). Other analyses have revealed evidence or raised questions about various kinds of advertiser influence on editorial content of farm periodicals (e.g., Sweeney & Hollifield, 2000;Walter, 1992;Reisner & Walter, 1994;Hays, 1992).…”
Section: Types and Effects Of Advertising-based Pressurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since information and communication play a dual role, farmers, as a consequence, need to identify the right message. The communication efforts are made in agriculture to increase production and influence farmer's practices (Walter, 1992). The adoption of chemicals to increase food production has neglected ecological concerns, leading them to consider that as a conventional agricultural practice.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, agricultural magazine content has been criticized for being narrowly focussed on production technologies and overtly influenced by advertisers and other agribusiness interests (Hays and Reisner 1990;Logsdon 1992;Reisner 1991;Reisner and Hays 1989). If these criticisms are accurate, such systematic biases in agricultural news coverage could lead farmers and the nonfarm public to be unaware of or otherwise misperceive one another's values and positions on important agricultural and natural resources issues (Walter 1992). Sustained negative news about agriculture in the general press (in coverage of such issues as food safety, animal rights, water quality, and federal commodity program abuses) could erode public support for farmers and farming (Hall et al 1977;Protess and McCombs 1991;Trew 1979b).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%