1993
DOI: 10.1016/0747-5632(93)90002-a
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Communication and memory of texts in face-to-face and computer-mediated communication

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This notion is supported by the post-interview feedback, which reveals that participants found it far easier to say ‘I don’t know’ to the avatar than participants in the FtoF condition who communicated directly with the interviewer. This indicates the social demands experienced by witnesses (see Fisher et al, 2011 ) were ameliorated by context and the physical absence of the questioner, which may have resulted in improved speaker–listener coordination ( Adrianson and Hjelmquist, 1993 ). Participants did not experience full embodiment in terms of avatar motions, only head movements were tracked, although head movements are viewed as sufficient to exhibit supportive and encouraging interviewer behaviors, which in turn can improve witness remembering (see Fisher and Schreiber, 2017 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This notion is supported by the post-interview feedback, which reveals that participants found it far easier to say ‘I don’t know’ to the avatar than participants in the FtoF condition who communicated directly with the interviewer. This indicates the social demands experienced by witnesses (see Fisher et al, 2011 ) were ameliorated by context and the physical absence of the questioner, which may have resulted in improved speaker–listener coordination ( Adrianson and Hjelmquist, 1993 ). Participants did not experience full embodiment in terms of avatar motions, only head movements were tracked, although head movements are viewed as sufficient to exhibit supportive and encouraging interviewer behaviors, which in turn can improve witness remembering (see Fisher and Schreiber, 2017 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two basic approaches are those of preventing spontaneous group discussion and of controlling the group discussion process. The first approach involves using some technique for information exchange in which there is no face-to-face interaction (e.g., Adrianson & Hjelmqvist, 1993;Arrow, 1997;Reid et al, 1997). For example, a mailbox can be used for exchange of written messages or a computer for transmitting verbal messages.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specific visual or graphical coding systems for research analysis of written work and electronic discourse have been developed for a variety of educational settings (Adrianson & Hjelmquist, 1993;Bales, 1976;Butler, 1992;Evans Knight, 1990;Ruberg et al, 1996). The cognotes codes created for this study were based on the rhetorical content coding of Butler (1992) and the reader response coding of language arts journalling (Evans Knight, 1990).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The software used for the electronic discussion group was part of the Acadia Courseware Management Environment (ACME). In order to address concerns regarding software and hardware familiarity effects (Adrianson & Hjelmquist, 1993) the course instructor adopted a gradual implementation plan for introducing the EDG format. Also, the instructional model (see Table II) was designed in response to the findings of Everett & Ahern (1994), that is, for electronic discussion to be most effective, it needed to be linked to pre-existing and upcoming learning activities and the implementation must be appropriately integrated into the instructional goals of the course.…”
Section: Specific Interactionmentioning
confidence: 99%