2011
DOI: 10.1080/03637751.2011.618358
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Communication and Materiality: A Conversation from theCM Café

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Their ontology refuses reductionism—of meaning and “thingness” to either symbolism or realism, as well as a refusal to reduce agency to human capacities. Refusing reductionism in this sense is consistent with calls made by others interested in developing richer conceptions of communication and materiality (e.g., Aakhus et al, ; Cloud, ; Greene, ; Kuhn, ; Leonardi & Barley, ; Wood & Cox, ). Finally, this paper is suggestive of a revision to the way we understand order in social life.…”
Section: Overviewsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…Their ontology refuses reductionism—of meaning and “thingness” to either symbolism or realism, as well as a refusal to reduce agency to human capacities. Refusing reductionism in this sense is consistent with calls made by others interested in developing richer conceptions of communication and materiality (e.g., Aakhus et al, ; Cloud, ; Greene, ; Kuhn, ; Leonardi & Barley, ; Wood & Cox, ). Finally, this paper is suggestive of a revision to the way we understand order in social life.…”
Section: Overviewsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…Integrated Structuration: Action in Structure and Structure in Action Aakhus et al (2011) remind scholars that while social structures are foundations for human behavior and interaction, they are not deterministic, nor absolute. As an example, the deinstitutionalization movement restructured mental health care in the United States (Lamb & Bachrach, 2001).…”
Section: Research Questionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, in this paper, we will be discussing material and discourse, terms with diverse and contested meanings and uses (Aakhus et al, 2011;Leonardi, 2012). To define the material, we follow Ashcraft, Kuhn, and Cooren (2009), who use sites, objects, and bodies to designate the material.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%