Communication and Intimacy-Enhancing Interventions for Men Diagnosed with Prostate Cancer and Their Partners

Abstract

Introduction The sexual dysfunction following prostate cancer treatments often leads to a reduction in intimate contact for couples. A number of psychosocial interventions have been developed to enhance intimacy in these couples. This paper reviews three of these interventions and is a summary of a presentation given as part of a symposium at the 2011 Cancer Survivorship and Sexual Health Meeting. Aim The goal of this presentation was to: (i) review three types of psychosocial interventions; and (ii) describe the methodological issues highlighted by these interventions. Main Outcome Measures Validated measures of relationship intimacy and communication. Methods To be selected, the interventions had to be: a randomized control trial, focus on a couples approach to therapy, and report at least one relationship outcome. Results The results were not consistent within or across studies, and suggest that some specific aspects of the interventions may be helpful for the patient, while other aspects of the studies may be helpful for the partner. The Northouse et al. study suggests that partners may benefit from a focus on couple work, as compared to the patient. The Canada et al. study indicates that when focusing on sexual functioning, working with a couple did not show significant benefit compared to working with a man alone. The study did show, however, that a sexual-based intervention can improve the use of erectile dysfunction treatments and suggests patients may benefit from specific focus on side effects of treatment. The Manne et al. study highlights the importance of targeting these interventions to couples who report distress, and for distressed couples, an intervention can show positive results. Conclusions Intimacy enhancing interventions can be effective for couples, while the partners may benefit more from couples work; the patients may benefit more from focus on specific side effects.

Biopsychosocial problem‐related distress in cancer: examining the role of sex and age

“…This sex‐based difference in endorsement has been reported in previous studies . Meanwhile, older male patients reported greater concern regarding sexual function as has been often reported in the literature . This fact calls attention to the importance of promoting discussion of this topic among patients and providers as well as further refuting the societal stereotype that elderly men may be less concerned with their sexual lives.…”

Couple‐focused interventions for men with localized prostate cancer and their spouses: A randomized clinical trial

“…These findings point to the challenge of identifying beneficial couple-focused interventions for prostate cancer patients and their spouses. As has been noted by Nelson and Kenowitz (2013), some aspects of psychological interventions may be helpful for the patient and other aspects may be helpful for the spouse. It is interesting to note that spouses rated IET more positively than GHW, while patients evaluated both treatments equally.…”

Life after prostate cancer: A systematic literature review and thematic synthesis of the post-treatment experiences of Black African and Black Caribbean men

“…There are some indications that partners of men with prostate cancer often undergo similar, or sometimes greater psychosocial distress (such as anxiety and depression) than the men themselves (Nelson & Kenowitz, ). Evidence related to Caucasian and African American populations show differing patterns in what contributes to men and their partners’ psychosocial distress after prostate cancer treatment.…”