2013
DOI: 10.1057/9781137017581
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Communicating Popular Science

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Through the process of sharing and expanding domains of expertise, research endeavors are informed by qualitatively rich discussions and possess greater potential for advancing science towards achieving desired outcomes. " Perrault (2013) defines four kinds of expertise, two of which are especially relevant to citizen science. Contributory expertise is the capability of contributing to what is known about a topic, either in theory or practice.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Through the process of sharing and expanding domains of expertise, research endeavors are informed by qualitatively rich discussions and possess greater potential for advancing science towards achieving desired outcomes. " Perrault (2013) defines four kinds of expertise, two of which are especially relevant to citizen science. Contributory expertise is the capability of contributing to what is known about a topic, either in theory or practice.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The traditional science communication is mostly unidirectional, thus to carry out such participatory processes it is necessary to go beyond the "deficit model" [Alcíbar, 2015;Brossard and Lewenstein, 2010;Perrault, 2013]. In participatory approaches this model coexists with others that offer a greater interaction such as the "dialogue model" that conceives communication as a two-way flow between science and the public [Brossard and Lewenstein, 2010;Smallman, 2018].…”
Section: Communication Role In Participatory Practicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Popularization, as defined by Calsamiglia and van Dijk (2004), is "a vast class of various types of communicative events or genres that involve the transformation of specialized knowledge into 'everyday' or 'lay knowledge'". Thus, science popularization is when scientific information is formulated in a way that can make lay public construct their understanding of the information and integrate it with their initial knowledge by defining specific terminology, giving examples, or using metaphors, to promote the scientific information to the non-expert audience and shape a public discussion (Calsamiglia and van Dijk, 2004;Perrault, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%