Communicating place, space and mobility

McIlvenny, Paul; Broth, Mathias; Haddington, Pentti

doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2008.09.014

Cited by 59 publications

(32 citation statements)

References 48 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…McIlvenny, Broth y Haddington (2009) proponen un concepto afín de lugar: "Lugar incluye las dimensiones de la experiencia vivida, la interacción y el uso de un espacio por sus habitantes" (McILVENNY;BROTH;HADDINGTON, 2009HADDINGTON, , p. 1879.…”

Section: Página83unclassified

Causalidad Y Lugar en La Práctica Narrativa Interaccional: El Macro Relato De La Violencia en El Barrio

Carranza

2016

Ling. (dis)curso

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Con una orientación hacia las nuevas fronteras en los estudios sobre narrativas en la vida cotidiana (CARRANZA, 2010; 2015a; WORTHAM; RHODES, 2015), aquí se propone considerar como macro relato el resultado de la integración de un conjunto de narrativas en un todo ensamblado por el receptor y desde su perspectiva, tal como ocurre en procedimientos institucionales. La práctica social observada pertenece al ámbito judicial, se desarrolla en una fiscalía de instrucción y abarca la toma de declaraciones testimoniales. La metodología empleada incluye el trabajo etnográfico de campo, el análisis narrativo y el uso de información visual y estadística que enriquece la interpretación de los acontecimientos narrados y de las experiencias en el lugar de residencia. El estudio revela la importancia de las conexiones causales establecidas en el mundo diegético y los significados asociados a la dimensión de lugar. Se demuestra la productividad de observar series de hechos de habla vinculados y de explorar los conjuntos y trayectorias textuales que emergen en ellos.

show abstract

Section: Página83unclassified

Causalidad Y Lugar en La Práctica Narrativa Interaccional: El Macro Relato De La Violencia en El Barrio

Carranza

2016

Ling. (dis)curso

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…For example, Heath (1986) shows the importance of the coordination between gaze, body posture and body manipulations of both doctor and patient; Mondada and Schmitt (2010) the coordination of a range of multimodal resources, going from gesture to body positions, in interactional openings; Mondada (2009) and Hausendorf et al (2012) the shaping of interactional space by the arrangement of the bodies; Goodwin and Goodwin (1996), Luff and Heath (1998) and Broth (2009) the local embodied adjustments to the complex ecology of the workplace; and McIlvenny et al (2009), Haddington et al (2013) and Broth et al (forthcoming) the importance of considering mobile bodies in interaction. Goodwin's work (2000) stands as a prime example of this multimodal interactional perspective, showing that it is crucial to consider other 'semiotic resources' than those offered by speakers' talk and by participants' bodies, such as the environment and the material artefacts that surround interactants, out of which they build complex 'contextual configurations', which contribute to the production and interpretation of meaningful activities.…”

Section: A Broad Way Of Considering Multimodality and Embodiment: Walmentioning

confidence: 99%

Walking away: The embodied achievement of activity closings in mobile interaction

Broth

Mondada

2013

Journal of Pragmatics

Self Cite

130

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In this paper we describe in detail the coordinated practices of walking away as reflexively contributing to the organization of activity closings. The paper contributes to conversation analytic studies interested in multimodality, space and mobility, by showing the relevance of walking for the systematic and situated organization of talk-in-interaction. More particularly, the paper deals with sequential environments in which activity closings are projected, and achieved by the participants; it shows that in this position, initiating walking away is a resource that makes closing publicly projectable and recognizable. Moreover, the study shows how walking away is a negotiated matter, being initiated by some, aligned or disaligned by others, possibly retracted and revised. Finally, the study demonstrates that walking away as a coordinated and negotiated practice raises normative expectations among the participants: a deviant case is discussed in which participants orient to the absence of such a coordination. In sum, the paper offers a detailed analysis of a particular multimodal practice --walking --as a conduct systematically coordinated with talk-in-interaction.

show abstract

“…Second, there are mobile ethnomethods (Ryave and Schenkein 1974;Coates 1999;Watson 1999;Hester and Francis 2003;Brown and Laurier 2005;) -that is, the emic methods that people use to assemble and account for the sensefulness of their mobile formations, practices and actions. Third, there is the power of an inductive methodology to examine sequences of mobile action (for recent work see McIlvenny, Broth, and Haddington 2009;Haddington et al 2012;Haddington, Mondada and Nevile 2013;McIlvenny 2013). Such an approach is therefore an antidote to 'just so' accounts of micro-mobility practices that assume mobility is practised in specific ways but without ever elaborating or investigating just how.…”

Section: Interactional Mobility Studies and Mobile Video Ethnographymentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The video camera has become an important tool to study mobile activities in a variety of ways (Albrecht 1985;Büscher 2005;Mausner 2006;vom Lehn and Heath 2006;Pink 2007;vom Lehn and Heath 2007;Brown, Dilley and Marshall 2008;Mausner 2008;McIlvenny, Broth, and Haddington 2009;Brown and Spinney 2010;Büscher, Urry, and Witchger 2010;McIlvenny 2011;Spinney 2011;Haddington, Keisanen, and Nevile 2012;Haddington, Mondada and Nevile 2013). Furthermore, video recording technology has miniaturised to the point that cameras are small enough for sports enthusiasts to embrace the new equipment for use in highly mobile sports under extreme circumstances.…”

Section: Interactional Mobility Studies and Mobile Video Ethnographymentioning

confidence: 99%

The Joy of Biking Together: Sharing Everyday Experiences of Vélomobility

McIlvenny

2013

Mobilities

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This paper analyses how adults and children elicit and share their everyday experiences of cycling together in a variety of circumstances. Video data were collected of commuter cyclists, family bike rides and school bike tours. Using an ethnomethodologically informed approach to talk, mobile action and interactional practices, the novel video recordings of these diverse vélomobile formations are analysed in order to document how cyclists organise and mobilise their experiences and accompanying emotions in relation to the concurrent activity of biking together. Assuming that displays of emotion are situated, social activities, the analysis focuses on how embodied displays of emotion are accomplished, maintained, assessed and resisted by co-riders in motion.

show abstract

Communicating place, space and mobility

Cited by 59 publications

References 48 publications

Causalidad Y Lugar en La Práctica Narrativa Interaccional: El Macro Relato De La Violencia en El Barrio

Causalidad Y Lugar en La Práctica Narrativa Interaccional: El Macro Relato De La Violencia en El Barrio

Walking away: The embodied achievement of activity closings in mobile interaction

The Joy of Biking Together: Sharing Everyday Experiences of Vélomobility

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About