2020
DOI: 10.17239/l1esll-2020.20.01.16
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Communicating metaknowledge to L2 learners: A fragile scaffold for participation in subject-related discourse?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
(30 reference statements)
0
17
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This would not have been possible had the teachers employed a decontextualizing approach, explaining the words and expression out of context of the novels (cf. Walldén, 2020c;Walldén & Nygård Larsson, 2021).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This would not have been possible had the teachers employed a decontextualizing approach, explaining the words and expression out of context of the novels (cf. Walldén, 2020c;Walldén & Nygård Larsson, 2021).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the study of classroom discourse, it is also important to consider how the negotiation of words and expressions relate to the text they appear in. Previous classroom studies (Walldén, 2020c;Walldén & Nygård Larsson, 2021, submitted) have problematized teachers explaining key disciplinary out of context of the disciplinary texts they appear in, in classroom activities separated from the joint and active process of interpreting subject-related discourse. As pointed out by Martin (2013), key disciplinary terms interplay with resources of abstract language and recurring, genrespecific ways of composing texts.…”
Section: Grammatical and Lexical Metaphors In Previous Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given that students encounter and process abstract knowledge of different kinds even in the early years of schooling (cf. Walldén, 2019Walldén, , 2020, there seems to be a great potential for enriching their understanding relating to the internet and the information which can be found there, thereby laying a foundation for critical literacy (Janks, 2013). We argue that the theoretical lens used in this study shows a possible step forward.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…This includes the use of logical connections to explain what the internet is and the use of evaluative resources of language to describe attitudes towards the internet (cf. Martin & Rose, 2007;Walldén, 2020).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This involved how the teacher directed students' attention to text features by asking questions and following up on their responses according to the triadic exchanges typical of classroom discourse (e.g., Mehan, 1979;Sinclair & Coulthard, 1975), alongside other interpersonal resources for engaging the students, such as the use of imperatives, exclamations, and evaluative resources of language (cf. Martin & Rose, 2007;Martin & White, 2005;Walldén, 2020b).…”
Section: Analytical Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%