Euroscepticism, Democracy and the Media 2017
DOI: 10.1057/978-1-137-59643-7_1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Communicating Europe, Contesting Europe: An Introduction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Researchers have noted that anti‐media discourse has contributed to the increasingly embedded nature of euroscepticism in certain EU Member States (Bijsmans, 2017; Caiani & Guerra, 2017; de Wilder et al, 2013). What distinguishes Britain from other EU Member States in terms of media discussion around the EU is the existence of the lopsided anti‐EU stance of the BTP.…”
Section: The British Tabloid Press As a Eurosceptic Agenda Settermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Researchers have noted that anti‐media discourse has contributed to the increasingly embedded nature of euroscepticism in certain EU Member States (Bijsmans, 2017; Caiani & Guerra, 2017; de Wilder et al, 2013). What distinguishes Britain from other EU Member States in terms of media discussion around the EU is the existence of the lopsided anti‐EU stance of the BTP.…”
Section: The British Tabloid Press As a Eurosceptic Agenda Settermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, despite recent studies such as the one carried out by García and Rivas de Roca [ 74 ] on the 2019 European Parliament elections, which suggest that the EU planned political communication strategies on Twitter with the aim of overcoming its structural problems, the main European countries reproduce the obvious shortcomings of the digital communication strategies implemented by the EU when it comes to effectively involving and mobilizing European citizens. Indeed, they prioritize the use of Twitter and digital narratives for information purposes without taking into account the decisive potential of this social network for the creation of interpretative frameworks on a given issue, as already addressed by Caiani and Guerra [ 78 ], Papagianneas [ 73 ], and Bouza and Tuñón [ 25 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Global Justice Movement (GJM) has been viewed as able to ‘build a critical public sphere that could contribute to making EU institutions accountable’ (della Porta and Caiani, 2009, p. 15). In this sense, Caiani and Guerra (2017) consider Euroscepticism ‘a qualified or outright opposition to the EU’ and Euroalternativism as a ‘pro‐systemic opposition’ that supports alternative policies and institutional reforms, arguing that ‘another Europe is possible’ (p. 6), whereas with ‘critical Europeanists’, they identify ‘those groups that support the process of Europe building but criticize the European policies’ (p. 6).…”
Section: The Debate: Europe From Below? a Social‐movement Perspectivementioning
confidence: 99%