Communicating Economic Concepts and Research in a Challenging Environment

Abstract

This address explores the communication challenges facing the economics profession and agri-food and rural economists in particular against a background of reputational damage to the profession and an apparent loss of trust in experts. It argues that a common thread linking many of the challenges is the need for more effective models of communication so that our economic concepts, ideas and research findings can be more timely, better understood and, most importantly, have greater impact. Five important challenges are examined: loss of trust in experts; emotions and decision making; the role of the media; the roles of agri-food and rural economists; and competition from other disciplines and interests. A good practice communications framework is then proposed embodying ten important communication principles: understanding the target audience; understanding the political context of decision makers; generating a robust evidence base; building reputation and credibility; need for cross disciplinary working; consulting with stakeholder groups; getting the timing right; producing high quality presentations; making use of social media; and being prepared for challenges. Four stereotypical categories of communication incorporating different standards of rigour and relevance are identified: Ivory tower; Gold Standard; Populist; and Quicksand. Responses by the Agricultural Economics Society and the European Association of Agricultural Economists to the need for more accessible communications via the development of the innovative outreach journal EuroChoices are outlined.

The Perception of Economic Growth and the Romanian “Mioritic Syndrome”

“…After decades of propaganda and rigid phraseology, connecting to citizens in a meaningful way proves to be a challenge. Economic growth and development are concepts relatively hard to convey objectively to the general public (Davis, 2018 ; Mazzi et al, 2021 ). The language employed by officials is still arid, dense, and arcane, sometimes on purpose.…”

Sustainable Agriculture – Life beyond Subsidies: Lessons from New Zealand

“…As policy makers shift emphasis from measuring production to measuring wellbeing, agricultural economists are well placed to contribute to a wider shift towards wellbeing policies that this is intended to support. Following on from insights in the Presidential Addresses of my two immediate predecessors (Midmore, ; Davis, ), the next section focuses on the particular contribution that growth in knowledge capital can bring to capabilities for personal and communal wellbeing.…”

EU‐UK Brexit Negotiations, Covid‐19 and Key Roles for Economists

“…This would recognise that while regulatory alignment between the UK and the EU could not realistically be perfect, it should be workable in respecting the interests and needs of both EU and UK producers and consumers and is effective and efficient (see the contribution by Wilkinson in this issue). In rising to this key challenge the profession should aim for the Gold Standard in communicating to policy makers and the public, demonstrating both rigour and relevance (Davis, ).…”