2018
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-98294-6_36
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Communicating Climate Change: Reactions to Adapt and Survive Exhibition and Visitors’ Thoughts About Climate Change in the Pacific Islands Region

Abstract: This paper examines the content and responses to an art installation addressing climate change in the Pacific, collected at the Adapt and Survive exhibition held at the University of the South Pacific Oceania Centre Gallery in 2014. The artist statement on the exhibition emphasised that it sought to explore the causes and effects of climate change, and to raise awareness of its wider impacts for cultural loss and societal change. As well as conducting a series of interviews with the artist, visitors to the exh… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 22 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Barbec and Chilton (2015) stated: ‘The objects of tangible heritage have meaning only because of the intangible values societies place on them, and intangible heritage almost always has an expression in tangible products or contexts’ (p. 268). Whether agricultural landscapes in the USA (Mitchell and Barret, 2015), historical buildings (Daly, 2019), or art installations composed of material objects to capture the subjective impact of climate change on Pacific Islanders (Hemstock and Capstick, 2019), tangible heritage is linked to the intangible values these objects hold. The loss of burial sites due to sea-level rise in Kosrae, Micronesia (Monnereau and Abraham, 2013) is a pertinent example of the profound grief that can be experienced by the loss of tangible heritage.…”
Section: Cultural Landscapesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Barbec and Chilton (2015) stated: ‘The objects of tangible heritage have meaning only because of the intangible values societies place on them, and intangible heritage almost always has an expression in tangible products or contexts’ (p. 268). Whether agricultural landscapes in the USA (Mitchell and Barret, 2015), historical buildings (Daly, 2019), or art installations composed of material objects to capture the subjective impact of climate change on Pacific Islanders (Hemstock and Capstick, 2019), tangible heritage is linked to the intangible values these objects hold. The loss of burial sites due to sea-level rise in Kosrae, Micronesia (Monnereau and Abraham, 2013) is a pertinent example of the profound grief that can be experienced by the loss of tangible heritage.…”
Section: Cultural Landscapesmentioning
confidence: 99%