2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.psychres.2022.114755
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Communicating and reading emotion with masked faces in the Covid era: A short review of the literature

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 115 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These include visual cues like facial expression or gestures that can increase the understanding of a speaker’s intent under challenging listening conditions such as in background noise ( Moradi et al, 2013 ), or convey nuances like irony or sarcasm ( Sumby and Pollack, 1954 ; Sommers et al, 2005 ; Moradi et al, 2013 ). For instance, the lack of ability of listeners to incorporate non-verbal context can contribute to miscommunication in aging, communication disorders, or under conditions like facial masking in healthcare settings ( Rankin et al, 2009 ; Ujiie et al, 2015 ; Moradi et al, 2016 ; Nuber et al, 2018 ; Ramdani et al, 2022 ). In the case of animal signalers, visual displays or olfactory cues in combination with vocalizations may likewise clarify a signal relative to background noise or transform its meaning (e.g., Smith and Evans, 2008 ; Ronald et al, 2017 , 2020 ; Caldart et al, 2022 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These include visual cues like facial expression or gestures that can increase the understanding of a speaker’s intent under challenging listening conditions such as in background noise ( Moradi et al, 2013 ), or convey nuances like irony or sarcasm ( Sumby and Pollack, 1954 ; Sommers et al, 2005 ; Moradi et al, 2013 ). For instance, the lack of ability of listeners to incorporate non-verbal context can contribute to miscommunication in aging, communication disorders, or under conditions like facial masking in healthcare settings ( Rankin et al, 2009 ; Ujiie et al, 2015 ; Moradi et al, 2016 ; Nuber et al, 2018 ; Ramdani et al, 2022 ). In the case of animal signalers, visual displays or olfactory cues in combination with vocalizations may likewise clarify a signal relative to background noise or transform its meaning (e.g., Smith and Evans, 2008 ; Ronald et al, 2017 , 2020 ; Caldart et al, 2022 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Masks also bias social judgments of trustworthiness, in some cases negatively (Biermann et al, 2021;Marini et al, 2021;Bylianto and Chan, 2023) and in others positively (Cartaud et al, 2020). Perhaps most strikingly, humans have been found to be significantly impaired at recognizing all six basic emotions when faces are covered with face masks (e.g., Carbon, 2020;Noyes et al, 2021;Pazhoohi et al, 2021;Aguillon-Hernandez et al, 2022;Blazhenkova et al, 2022;Ramachandra and Longacre, 2022;Ramdani et al, 2022;Rinck et al, 2022;Wong and Estudillo, 2022;McCrackin et al, 2022a;Proverbio et al, 2023 for a review). This general emotion recognition detriment varies with individual emotions, such that the largest impairment is typically reported for disgust (e.g., Carbon, 2020;Rinck et al, 2022;Wong and Estudillo, 2022;McCrackin et al, 2022a) and the smallest for fear (e.g., Carbon, 2020;McCrackin et al, 2022a).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, they may impair the observer’s ability to accurately identify the emotions conveyed by a person’s facial expressions [ 8 ]. A survey has shown that adults’ identification accuracy dropped when asked to identify faces with their mouths covered [ 9 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%