2014
DOI: 10.1542/peds.2013-3608e
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Communicating About Prognosis: Ethical Responsibilities of Pediatricians and Parents

Abstract: Clinicians are sometimes reluctant to discuss prognosis with parents of children with life-threatening illness, usually because they worry about the emotional impact of this information. However, parents often want this prognostic information because it underpins informed decision-making, especially near the end of life. In addition, despite understandable clinician concerns about its emotional impact, prognostic disclosure can actually support hope and peace of mind among parents struggling to live with a chi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
118
1
7

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 102 publications
(127 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
1
118
1
7
Order By: Relevance
“…On the American/European approach, for older children and adolescents, the justification for disclosure emphasizes the developing autonomy of the child and the need to know, even and often against parents' wishes. 12,17,[31][32][33][34][35][36] On the Kenyan conception, as articulated by our participants, there was greater sensitivity and empathy given to resistant caregivers and greater effort made to balance parent/caregiver and child interests. When caregivers were not ready for disclosure, providers took an insistent yet respectful approach to bringing caregivers along in the plan for disclosure and demonstrated remarkable sympathy for caregivers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the American/European approach, for older children and adolescents, the justification for disclosure emphasizes the developing autonomy of the child and the need to know, even and often against parents' wishes. 12,17,[31][32][33][34][35][36] On the Kenyan conception, as articulated by our participants, there was greater sensitivity and empathy given to resistant caregivers and greater effort made to balance parent/caregiver and child interests. When caregivers were not ready for disclosure, providers took an insistent yet respectful approach to bringing caregivers along in the plan for disclosure and demonstrated remarkable sympathy for caregivers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Attending to the stressful reality of these situations for both parents and health care providers requires a nuanced orientation that marries a relational, process-oriented approach and the functional assessment of when to initiate discussions. This is a hopeful path forward rooted in evidence already generated (Nyborn et al 2016; Mack and Joffe 2014; Janvier, Barrington, and Farlow 2014). …”
mentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Several studies point to communication problems that health care clinicians encounter with their patients and families, particularly at the end of life (Curtis et al 2000). In fact, many barriers exist, as illustrated by the case exemplars outlined by Weiss and Fiester, and may include family misunderstanding about aggressive treatments, lack of clinician training and skills in end-of-life discussions, differences of opinion and conflict regarding goals of care, and generalized discomfort with approaching families about end-of-life issues (Mack and Joffe 2014; Janvier, Barrington, and Farlow 2014). …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Discussing death with their children who may be or are dying is even more daunting. As difficult as it may be, the vast majority of parents do not regret discussing death/goals of care with their children (J. W. Mack & Joffe, 2014). Moreover, 27% of parents regret not addressing it in one large study (Kreicbergs et al, 2004).…”
Section: End Of Lifementioning
confidence: 99%