2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.pubrev.2006.11.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Communicating about corporate social responsibility: A comparative study of CSR reporting in Australia and Slovenia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
189
0
14

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 290 publications
(210 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
3
189
0
14
Order By: Relevance
“…Institutional theorists suggest that sustainability reporting, rather than being purposefully initiated to achieve specific business case outcomes, occurs because managers acquiesce to social pressure that Recent studies show that sustainability reporting is becoming institutionalised in a size-based global field (Kolk, 2011), a few geographically-based regional/national fields, some industry-based fields, and in a strategy-based field (Kolk, 2011;Chen & Bouvain, 2009;Golob & Bartlett, 2007;Kolk, 2005Kolk, , 2010aYoung & Marais, 2012;Herremans, Herschovis, & Bertels, 2008;Bebbington, Higgins, & Frame, 2009). The wider sustainability literature, which is increasingly taking an institutional perspective, suggests that 'corporate greening' may be related to the emergence of an 'issues-based' field, so a similar field may shape sustainability reporting (Hoffman, 1999;Hoffman & Ocasio, 2001).…”
Section: Forthcoming In Journal Of Business Ethicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Institutional theorists suggest that sustainability reporting, rather than being purposefully initiated to achieve specific business case outcomes, occurs because managers acquiesce to social pressure that Recent studies show that sustainability reporting is becoming institutionalised in a size-based global field (Kolk, 2011), a few geographically-based regional/national fields, some industry-based fields, and in a strategy-based field (Kolk, 2011;Chen & Bouvain, 2009;Golob & Bartlett, 2007;Kolk, 2005Kolk, , 2010aYoung & Marais, 2012;Herremans, Herschovis, & Bertels, 2008;Bebbington, Higgins, & Frame, 2009). The wider sustainability literature, which is increasingly taking an institutional perspective, suggests that 'corporate greening' may be related to the emergence of an 'issues-based' field, so a similar field may shape sustainability reporting (Hoffman, 1999;Hoffman & Ocasio, 2001).…”
Section: Forthcoming In Journal Of Business Ethicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar observations are made regarding MNCs adoption of other environmental initiatives, in which the largest global companies adopt "a global, cosmopolitan 7 orientation that is not tied to any national identity" (Kostova & Zaheer, 1999, p. 73). Other clusters of reporting are apparent in some countries and regions rather than others, suggesting the institutionalisation of reporting is geographically-based (Chen & Bouvain, 2009;Golob & Bartlett, 2007;Kolk, 2005Kolk, , 2010aKolk, Walhain, & van de Wateringen, 2001;Young & Marais, 2012). There may also be institutional pressures within industry-based fields, accounting for why reporting is more common in some industries than others (Herremans et al, 2008).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CSRD is a key tool for communicating with stakeholders regarding a company's social responsibility activities. It forms a central charter for public relations in communicating and creating mutual understanding, managing potential conflicts and achieving legitimacy (Golob & Bartlett, 2007).…”
Section: European Commission Described Csr As "A Concept Where By Commentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, other studies try to determine the impact that different institutional environments have on CSR reporting practices (Adams, 2002;Golob & Bartlett, 2007;Grecco et al, 2013;Tschopp, 2005;Young & Marais, 2012). One of the characteristics of this kind of research is that it is mainly focused on developed countries, although their institutional environments vary according to two classifications: Variety of Capitalism (VOC) (Hall & Solskic, 2001) and the Governance Index Environment (GEI ) (Li & Filer, 2007).…”
Section: Country Selection and Samplementioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to previous empirical evidence, the majority of these external pressures come from the industry (Sweeney & Coughlan, 2008) and the institutional environment in which they operate (Adams, 2002;Chen & Bouvain, 2009;Golob & Bartlett, 2007;Kolk & Perego, 2010;Michelon, Pilonato, & Ricceri, 2015;Prado, Gallego, & García, 2009), which clearly determines the degree of engagement in CSR disclosure practices.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%