2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijom.2007.12.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Communicating a clinical problem to the engineers: towards a common methodology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A low-dose CT scan of the head was performed 6 , from which the authors determined the anterior, posterior, and inferior limits of the chin with the newly developed and validated 3D cephalometric planar analysis (ACRO 3D) ( Fig. 1B) 5,7 . The osteotomy lines were planned and visualized with Mimics software (Materialize, Leuven, Belgium).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A low-dose CT scan of the head was performed 6 , from which the authors determined the anterior, posterior, and inferior limits of the chin with the newly developed and validated 3D cephalometric planar analysis (ACRO 3D) ( Fig. 1B) 5,7 . The osteotomy lines were planned and visualized with Mimics software (Materialize, Leuven, Belgium).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Joint efforts between the surgical and engineering communities should be directed toward integrated surgical simulators for training surgeons for complex surgeries, based on simulations of maxillofacial anatomy, image fusion modalities, and the haptic interface. The most pressing issue is to establish effective communication between surgeons and engineers, so that clinical problem encountered by surgeons can be communicated to the engineers and resolved through joint efforts [293].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%