2013
DOI: 10.1007/s00265-013-1601-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Communal nesting, kinship, and maternal success in a social primate

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

3
66
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(69 citation statements)
references
References 90 publications
3
66
0
Order By: Relevance
“…marmosets and tamarins, Callitrichidae  [14]; siamangs, Sy. syndactylus  [31,32]; black-and-white ruffed lemurs, V. variegata  [27]). Even though we did not find that receipt of alloparenting was positively correlated with the amount of time that mothers spent feeding, those mothers whose infants were handled more could still have benefited because they could forage more efficiently and thereby increase their net energy gain when they were not encumbered by infants and/or because they expend less energy on carrying young [6,10,12,15,31,32].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…marmosets and tamarins, Callitrichidae  [14]; siamangs, Sy. syndactylus  [31,32]; black-and-white ruffed lemurs, V. variegata  [27]). Even though we did not find that receipt of alloparenting was positively correlated with the amount of time that mothers spent feeding, those mothers whose infants were handled more could still have benefited because they could forage more efficiently and thereby increase their net energy gain when they were not encumbered by infants and/or because they expend less energy on carrying young [6,10,12,15,31,32].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alloparenting can also differentially affect the fitness of mothers among and within populations of the same species because the rates and types of interactions are not always consistent across individuals (e.g. meerkats, S. suricatta  [26]; sperm whales, Physeter macrocephalus  [4]; black-and-white ruffed lemurs, Varecia variegata  [27]; humans, H. sapiens  [28]). In some cases, alloparenting may seemingly have no direct fitness benefits to mothers (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The birds preferred nest sites that had been previously occupied, or that were in proximity to nests where conspecifics had high breeding success in previous years, and for locales that were surrounded by active nests. Unfortunately, due to the infrequent and unpredictable nature of ruffed lemur reproduction (Baden et al, ; Vasey, ), I was unable to consider long‐term social variables in my analyses. Future work will consider whether nest site characteristics, allomaternal help, or a combination of the two contribute to the survival of infants and lifetime reproductive success of mothers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alternatively, multiple nest building may be a strategy to avoid predator attraction either by allowing females to regularly transfer infants among nests (e.g., because feces may attract predators by its odor or appearance, Petit et al 1989; but see Soanes, Peters, Delhey, & Doody, ) or as way to allow mothers to adjust nest use and opportunistically avoid certain nests altogether (e.g., due to the unexpected arrival of a predator to the area or a shift in the dominant predator type, as described by Beckmann and Martin (). Unfortunately, the predator avoidance hypothesis is also among the most difficult to test because predation events are rare and difficult to observe (Stanford, ) and experimentally manipulating nesting behaviors is ill‐advised in a Critically Endangered species with a slow, unpredictable breeding pattern (Baden et al, ). In future studies, it would be interesting to compare patterns of nest building during years with and without predation events (e.g., whether females vacillate between multiple and single nest construction in times with and without predator threat, respectively) to further test whether this hypothesis garners support.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%