2021
DOI: 10.1007/s00780-021-00459-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Commonotonicity and time-consistency for Lebesgue-continuous monetary utility functions

Abstract: It is proved that monetary utility functions that are commonotonic and time-consistent are conditional expectations. We also give additional results on atomless and conditionally atomless probability spaces. These notions describe that in a filtration, there are many new events at each time step.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this paper 1 we will work with a probability space equipped with three sigma algebras (Ω, F 0 ⊂ F 1 ⊂ F 2 , P). The sigma algebra F 0 is supposed to be trivial F 0 = {∅, Ω} whereas the sigma algebra F 2 is supposed to express innovations with respect to F 1 .…”
Section: Notationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In this paper 1 we will work with a probability space equipped with three sigma algebras (Ω, F 0 ⊂ F 1 ⊂ F 2 , P). The sigma algebra F 0 is supposed to be trivial F 0 = {∅, Ω} whereas the sigma algebra F 2 is supposed to express innovations with respect to F 1 .…”
Section: Notationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We will use the notation K for such a kernel. More precisely: the mapping K : Ω × F 2 → R + satisfies (1) For almost every ω ∈ Ω, the mapping K(ω, .) : F 2 → [0, 1] is a probability.…”
Section: Notationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The present paper is a generalisation of the author's paper [3] on monetary utility functions, satisfying (because of concavity) a downward continuity assumption. The author is grateful to Patrick Cheridito and Michael Kupper for insisting on looking at the more general context of monotonic convex functions.…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%