1999
DOI: 10.1121/1.427645
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Commonality in the dorsal articulations of English vowels and liquids

Abstract: Phonological studies have predicted that the dorsal articulations of English /r/ and /l/ correspond with those of schwa and open o, respectively [Gick, Phonology (in press)]. Specifically, /r/ and schwa are hypothesized to share pharyngeal configuration, while /l/ and open o share upper pharyngeal/uvular configuration. To test this prediction, midsagittal MRI images of the vocal tract of a male speaker of American English were collected and midsagittal distance (of airspace above the tongue surface) measured a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The McMahon et al [1994] hypothesis proposes that, if the anterior raising gesture of /r/ were removed, the remaining tongue configuration would closely resemble the articulation of schwa. Gick [1999] takes this proposal a step further, arguing that all final schwas in lexical words (in r-intruding dialects only) are simply the final allophones of /r/ [see Gick et al, 2000, for MRI evidence on this point]. Both the original hypothesis proposed by McMahon et al [1994] and its extension proposed by Gick [1999] support the basic prediction that an /r/-like pharyngeal constriction should be found in schwa, at least in r-intruding dialects.…”
Section: The Connection Between Schwa and /R/mentioning
confidence: 50%
“…The McMahon et al [1994] hypothesis proposes that, if the anterior raising gesture of /r/ were removed, the remaining tongue configuration would closely resemble the articulation of schwa. Gick [1999] takes this proposal a step further, arguing that all final schwas in lexical words (in r-intruding dialects only) are simply the final allophones of /r/ [see Gick et al, 2000, for MRI evidence on this point]. Both the original hypothesis proposed by McMahon et al [1994] and its extension proposed by Gick [1999] support the basic prediction that an /r/-like pharyngeal constriction should be found in schwa, at least in r-intruding dialects.…”
Section: The Connection Between Schwa and /R/mentioning
confidence: 50%
“…The secondary or tertiary locations are necessary for production of an acceptable acoustic version of the phoneme, but their degree of constriction is either less or more variable across different prosodic or phonetic contexts. 16,17 One example is the vowel /u/. Although /u/ is typically listed as a back vowel, and the raising of the tongue dorsum in the vicinity of the velopalate is considered the primary constriction, a secondary constriction in the form of lip-rounding is generally present as well.…”
Section: Variability Of Tongue Shapesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The production of [Ѣ] involves two articulatory gestures (Delattre and Freeman, 1968;Hagiwara, 1995;Gick, 1999;Gick et al, 2000Gick et al, , 2002Gick and Campbell, 2003), which, following Gick (1999), are labeled the tongue blade/body raising gesture and the pharyngeal narrowing gesture here. Gick and Campbell (2003) McMahon (1994McMahon ( , 2000.…”
Section: Phonetics Of English Coda [ѣ]mentioning
confidence: 99%