2022
DOI: 10.1080/00016357.2022.2095021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Common resilience factors among healthy individuals exposed to chronic adversity: a systematic review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This result is particularly relevant if we consider the concept and origin of resilience, within the theoretical framework that includes hardiness. Resilience includes personal skills that allow growth in the face of adversity ( Nordström et al 2022 ), in this case, in the face of circumstances caused by a pandemic where uncertainty, stress, and in particular, concerns about self-contagion were inherent ( Gil-Almagro et al 2022 ; Romeu-Labayen et al 2022 ). The results obtained show that the higher the levels of associated stress, the more relevant it is to be open to experience in order to ensure (and promote) resilient health professionals (high hardiness).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This result is particularly relevant if we consider the concept and origin of resilience, within the theoretical framework that includes hardiness. Resilience includes personal skills that allow growth in the face of adversity ( Nordström et al 2022 ), in this case, in the face of circumstances caused by a pandemic where uncertainty, stress, and in particular, concerns about self-contagion were inherent ( Gil-Almagro et al 2022 ; Romeu-Labayen et al 2022 ). The results obtained show that the higher the levels of associated stress, the more relevant it is to be open to experience in order to ensure (and promote) resilient health professionals (high hardiness).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…is experienced in qualitative research, whereas the remaining authors have limited experience. A systematic review has shown that salutogenic factors among populations of low socioeconomic status can stem both from the individual (behavioural and psychosocial) and from environmental (community and family) domains [28]. The preconception was, thus, that the salience of salutogenic factors is complex and differs by context.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%